Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AgriciDaniel/claude-code-essentials-vs-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/agricidaniel/claude-code-essentials-vs-code/security-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/agricidaniel/claude-code-essentials-vs-code/security-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/agricidaniel/claude-code-essentials-vs-code/security-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/agricidaniel/claude-code-essentials-vs-code/security-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/agricidaniel/claude-code-essentials-vs-code/security-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00006 | $0.00127 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00051 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00025 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
security-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Audit security for: $ARGUMENTS
Check for:
- SQL injection vulnerabilities
- XSS in templates/outputs
- CSRF protection gaps
- Authentication/authorization flaws
- Hardcoded secrets or credentials
- Insecure dependencies (use the project's existing audit tool; report missing tooling rather than installing it automatically)
- Input validation gaps
- Error information exposure
- Insecure file operations
- Missing rate limiting
Rate each finding: Critical > High > Medium > Low Provide specific fixes for each vulnerability found.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed d8534762b709
- 1mo ago First seen · 20 lines · 6 tokens per session scan A 4effac1c6da4
security-audit is a command published in the GitHub repository AgriciDaniel/claude-code-essentials-vs-code (64 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 6 tokens to every session and 127 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
canvas
AI-orchestrated visual canvas production — create, populate, layout, present, generate, and export Obsidian canvases.
ace:execute-plan
Execute current PLAN.md with parallel Team Leads.
ace:validate-zones
Check for zone conflicts in project-types.json.
ace:consider-issues
Review deferred issues for potential inclusion.
ace:validate-plan
Verify PLAN.md structure before execution.
ace:recover-execution
Resume from mid-plan execution failures.