Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to AI-agents-incubator/n8n-pilot. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AI-agents-incubator/n8n-pilot/main/.claude/commands/test.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AI-agents-incubator/n8n-pilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ai-agents-incubator/n8n-pilot/test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ai-agents-incubator/n8n-pilot/test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ai-agents-incubator/n8n-pilot/test.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00434 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00217 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00087 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Помоги написать тесты для указанного кода.
Стратегия тестирования:
-
Определи тип теста:
- Unit тест (функция, хук)
- Component тест (UI компонент)
- Integration тест (Server Action, API)
- E2E тест (user flow)
-
Определи что тестировать:
- Happy path (основной сценарий)
- Edge cases (граничные случаи)
- Error cases (обработка ошибок)
- Различные входные данные
-
Настрой окружение:
- Необходимые моки (Supabase, OpenAI, etc)
- Test data
- Helpers
-
Напиши тесты:
- Arrange (подготовка)
- Act (действие)
- Assert (проверка)
-
Покрытие:
- Все основные сценарии покрыты
- Edge cases учтены
- Ошибки обрабатываются
Пример структуры:
describe('ComponentName', () => {
describe('when user is authenticated', () => {
it('should render correctly', () => {
// test
})
it('should handle submit', () => {
// test
})
})
describe('when user is not authenticated', () => {
it('should redirect to login', () => {
// test
})
})
describe('error handling', () => {
it('should show error message on failure', () => {
// test
})
})
})
Best practices:
- Тестируй поведение, не реализацию
- Используй понятные названия тестов
- Изолируй тесты друг от друга
- Мокируй внешние зависимости
- Проверяй как success, так и error cases
См. .claude/testing-guide.md для подробностей.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 72 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 4cbd6e9ca448
test is a command published in the GitHub repository AI-agents-incubator/n8n-pilot (29 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 434 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other commands, from other repositories
verify
Run repository verification using the verification-loop skill.
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
test-coverage
Analyze test coverage and identify the highest-value gaps to fill.
tdd
A command that follows test-driven development (TDD), a method where you write tests before the code they check. It moves through writing a failing test, adding the smallest implementation, and then improving the code.
check-dev
Type-check a Z specification with fuzz.
laravel-playwright
E2E Playwright patterns; use the laravel:e2e-playwright skill exactly as written.