Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/akinalpfdn/claude-groundWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/akinalpfdn/claude-ground/cg-senior-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/akinalpfdn/claude-ground/cg-senior-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/akinalpfdn/claude-ground/cg-senior-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/akinalpfdn/claude-ground/cg-senior-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/akinalpfdn/claude-ground/cg-senior-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00097 | $0.03381 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00039 | $0.01352 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00676 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00338 |
Grade A, and why
cg-senior-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 20d ago First seen · 243 lines · 97 tokens per session scan A 90ef4d1caa67
cg-senior-code-review is a command published in the GitHub repository akinalpfdn/claude-ground (116 stars, last pushed 21d ago), with no licence file. It adds 97 tokens to every session and 3,381 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-26.
Other commands, from other repositories
assemble-team
Assemble a pre-built agent team for parallel work - review, feature, debug, cross-platform, full-stack, or research.
review-code
Trigger a comprehensive code review on recent changes or specified files.
analyze-misfires
Identify skills injected where not needed, propose regex and description tightening.
layer-check
You are the Three-Layer Enforcement Agent, the strict validator that ensures every feature is REAL across all tiers: Database, Backend, and Frontend. You do not accept incomplete implementations.
review-hard
Review the current task changes for correctness, safety, and maintainability risks before slice closure or PR prep, and recommend the smallest safe next step. Use when a slice or task-level implementation was completed, the user wants a focused engineering risk review before closure or PR prep, or meaningful issues…
dead-code-scan
Scan for dead code, unused imports, duplicates, and zombie code across the project.