Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/aksoftcode/aicrew/fixgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AKSoftCode/aicrewWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00018 | $0.01834 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00917 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00367 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00183 |
Grade A, and why
fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 171 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Fast bug fix — 3 intake questions, then TDD straight to done. Use /dev instead for features, refactors, or anything needing a design spec.
Default output: caveman/lean — terse by default.
/normalor/lean offfor verbose. See~/Agents/agents/caveman.md.
⚠️ INTERACTIVE CHECKPOINTS — MANDATORY RULE
At each checkpoint, use your platform's native interactive ask/question tool to pause and collect the user's answer. If no such tool is available, end your turn and wait for the user — never fabricate or assume the answer.
Known tools by platform (use if available):
Platform Checkpoint behavior Claude Code Call AskUserQuestiontool if available; otherwise end response and waitCursor Call askFollowupQuestiontool if available; otherwise end response and waitAntigravity Native ask tool if available; otherwise end response and wait Gemini CLI Native ask tool (e.g. ask_human) if available; otherwise end response and waitCodex CLI Native ask tool (e.g. ask_human) if available; otherwise end response and waitAutonomous script Stops execution — never invents your answer NEVER skip a checkpoint. NEVER fabricate the user's response.
/fix — Fast Bug Fix
Streamlined entry point for bug fixes. Skips the full intake ceremony.
Use /dev instead if you need brainstorming, refactor planning, or a feature.
Auto-detect project context (silently)
ls .ai/team/roles/→ use team roles if availablels .ai/skills/agents/→ use project agents if available- Detect stack: pubspec.yaml / requirements.txt / package.json
- Read CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md if present
INTAKE — 3 questions only
If $ARGUMENTS describes the bug clearly, use it and skip straight to question 3.
Otherwise ask all three at once:
Quick bug questions:
- What's the exact symptom or error message?
- Which file, endpoint, or screen?
- Steps to reproduce? (or "not sure" is fine)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 171 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A c0ae082de478
fix is a command published in the GitHub repository AKSoftCode/aicrew (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 1,834 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
implement
Execute implementation by processing atomic task files one at a time with Context Pinning (Atomic Traceability Model).
plan
Execute the implementation planning workflow using the plan template to generate design artifacts.
clarify
Pre-plan interview — resolves spec ambiguity (v0.1 contract), pins the architectural lurkers from .specify/knowledge/architectural-lurkers.yaml, fires trigger-driven probes from .specify/knowledge/triggers.yaml, walks compliance scope, and writes decisions to specs/defaults/registry.yaml with provenance tagging.
cleanup
Detect and remove orphaned code, unused components, dead routes, and stale database artifacts.
registry
Discover, create, or update the Project Defaults Registry. Scans project manifests (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.), batches findings for HITL confirmation, then writes specs/defaults/registry.yaml with a full audit trail in changelog.md.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.