Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alaliqing/claude-paperWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/alaliqing/claude-paper/claude-paper-summary)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alaliqing/claude-paper/claude-paper-summary"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alaliqing/claude-paper/claude-paper-summary/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alaliqing/claude-paper/claude-paper-summary"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alaliqing/claude-paper/claude-paper-summary.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00035 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00017 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00007 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00003 |
Grade A, and why
claude-paper-summary scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Load the claude-paper-summary skill and follow it for this paper input:
$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 8 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 9addc3f25136
claude-paper-summary is a command published in the GitHub repository alaliqing/claude-paper (335 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 35 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
install-context
Install OpenAgents Control context files.
fix
Auto-fix linting, formatting, and common issues.
doctor
Run the specrails health check to validate that all prerequisites are correctly configured for this repository.
status
Pipeline status for a spec/feature — or, with no slug, the whole-project delivery report (every spec/backlog/quick-task + GitHub/Linear cross-ref).
review
Review current changes for correctness, style, and potential issues.
init
Initialize СС Blueprint Toolkit - copy actual documentation templates to your project.