Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Alberto-Codes/docvet. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Alberto-Codes/docvet/main/.claude/commands/bmad-shard-doc.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Alberto-Codes/docvetWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/alberto-codes/docvet/bmad-shard-doc)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alberto-codes/docvet/bmad-shard-doc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alberto-codes/docvet/bmad-shard-doc.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00077 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00039 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00015 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00008 |
Grade A, and why
shard-doc scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to shard-doc — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
shard-doc
Read the entire task file at: {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/shard-doc.xml
Follow all instructions in the task file exactly as written.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 11 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 116844450326
shard-doc is a command published in the GitHub repository Alberto-Codes/docvet (9 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 77 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to shard-doc, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
doc-gen
Generate documentation — JSDoc, docstrings, README sections, or API docs.
extract-foundations-from-screens
Extract canonical foundations docs (foundations/color.md, foundations/typography.md, foundations/spacing.md, foundations/radii.md) from a batch of existing SCREENSPECs. Idempotent: re-runs only add new tokens, never overwrite existing role mappings, and route conflicts to a Review queue. Use when SCREENSPECs already…
sessions
Generate implementation session prompts from a PRD or research doc.
deploy
Command "deploy" from PraveenJayaprakash-JP/repomemory, covering deployment workflow, 1. pre-deploy checks, 2. build verification, 3. environment validation and 4. deployment steps (platform detection).
doc-audit
Audit Korean technical document content completeness using ko-tech-doc-audit harness. Reader is fixed as onboarding junior developer.
audit-tests
Classify tests by value — find ceremony vs. real protection.