Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/aleksandarbisevac/claude-plugins/buggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AleksandarBisevac/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/aleksandarbisevac/claude-plugins/bug)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/aleksandarbisevac/claude-plugins/bug"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/aleksandarbisevac/claude-plugins/bug.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00047 | $0.01256 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00628 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00251 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00126 |
Grade A, and why
bug scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/audit:bug — bug tracking on the audit manifest
Bugs live in the manifest's top-level bugs[], OUTSIDE phases — a reported bug is not
yet a plan. fix materializes a bug into a tdd task (red-first repro test) that
/audit:run executes; the orchestrator flips the bug to fixed when that task commits.
Bug lifecycle: open → triaged → in_progress (materialized) → fixed | wontfix.
$ARGUMENTS: first token is the subcommand. Unknown/empty → print usage and stop.
0. Conventions
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/manifest-conventions.md FIRST. Resolve and read
the manifest. If it doesn't exist, stop and point to /audit:init (or the starter template).
After EVERY mutation: revalidate with
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/manifest/validate-manifest.py" <manifestPath>.
The write subcommands (add/fix/close) hold the concurrency lock (see conventions →
Concurrency lock) around their writes; list is read-only and never locks.
Subcommand: add "<title>"
- If the manifest has no top-level
bugsarray, create it ("bugs": []) via Edit. - Gather (ask only for what's missing):
severity(low/med/high),description,repro(steps, string or array),expected,actual, suspectedfiles(verify with Glob/Grep; empty is allowed). - Allocate
BUG-<max existing bug number + 1>and append:{id, title, status: "open", severity, reportedAt: <ISO now>, reportedBy: null, description, repro, expected, actual, files, taskId: null, fixedIn: null, notes: null}. - Revalidate. Report the bug id and the handoff:
/audit:bug fix <id>when ready.
Subcommand: list [all|<status>]
Read-only. Print a table id | severity | status | title | taskId | reportedAt.
Default filter: everything NOT fixed/wontfix. list all shows everything;
list <status> filters to that status. Empty result → say so and point to add.
Subcommand: fix <bugId> [--phase <id>]
- Refuse when: the bug doesn't exist; its status is
fixed/wontfix; or itstaskIdis already set and that task is notdone→ point to/audit:run <taskId>instead (one bug = one live task; no second execution engine). - Target phase:
--phase <id>if given (must not bedone); else the latestBF<n>phase whose status !=done; else CREATEBF<max+1>(titleBugfix batch <n>, the conventions doc's new-phase template,testGatefrommeta.buildCommands— at minimum thetestkey). - Materialize the task (new-task template + these specifics):
- id
<phaseId>.<next>; titleFix <bugId>: <bug title>. descriptionembedding the bug's repro / expected / actual verbatim.files= bug'sfiles;bugId: "<bugId>".tests: {mode: "tdd", add: ["repro test that FAILS on current code: <expected> vs <actual>"], expectRedFirst: true, gate: [<phase testGate>]}.risk: bug severity high →high, med →med, elselow.model:sonnet(or stronger forrisk: "high").
- id
- Update the bug:
status: "in_progress",taskId: <new task id>. - Extend
fileIndexwith the task's files. Revalidate. - Report + handoff:
Materialized <taskId> for <bugId> — run /audit:run <taskId>. Do NOT execute the fix here — execution, commits, and the red-first check are the/audit:run//audit:phasejob (it also flips the bug tofixed+fixedInon the task commit).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 73 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A e71db8f89de1
bug is a command published in the GitHub repository AleksandarBisevac/claude-plugins (4 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,256 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
post
Post the current OCR review to a GitHub PR.
show
Display a past OCR review session.
history
List past OCR review sessions.
overlay-apply
Apply NIST 800-53 overlays (FedRAMP, DoD, Privacy, etc.) to existing baselines.
sdlc
Master orchestrator for the complete 5-phase SDLC pipeline. Runs all phases sequentially with approval gates and handoffs between each phase. Organizes artifacts into handoffs/, docs/, and projects/ directories.
pillar-guidance
Deep dive guidance on DORA's 5 pillars and implementation requirements.