Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add AleksandarBisevac/claude-plugins/plugin install auditWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/aleksandarbisevac/claude-plugins/report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/aleksandarbisevac/claude-plugins/report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/aleksandarbisevac/claude-plugins/report.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.02678 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01339 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00536 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00268 |
Grade A, and why
report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 163 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/audit:report — render the status report
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/orchestrator.md and
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/manifest-conventions.md first. Run preflight steps 1–2 only
(read-only: no git-root/submodule check, no lock).
Run
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/report/render-report.py" <manifestPath>
(pass --out-dir <dir> through from $ARGUMENTS when given; artifacts otherwise land next to the
manifest) and print the written paths.
Optional AI summary (recommended). Before rendering, compose a 2–4 sentence, plain-language
summary of the audit's current state — synthesize the phases' desiredOutcome/summary, notable
task outcomes, open bugs, and the rollup (audit-status.py <manifestPath> --json). Write it to a
scratch file (e.g. <out-dir or manifest dir>/.audit-summary.txt, via Bash) and add
--summary-file <that file> to the render command; the renderer shows it in a Summary box in the
HTML, the Markdown, and the printable PDF. It is passed to the renderer only — it does NOT modify
the manifest, so /audit:report stays read-only (no lock).
The HTML opens standalone (double-click): in-page text/status filtering, area chips when the plan
tags areas (they gate phases, like the status chips, and travel in the shareable #! hash as
a=), per-phase collapse, a Save as PDF button (browser print, all phases expanded, either
orientation) and a Download .md button — all
self-contained (inline CSS + JS, zero network fetches), publishable as a CI artifact. The Usage
section adds author chips when the ledger records more than one author — they scope that section's
per-author views only, because tasks record no author to filter by, and the page says so — and a
Month-by-month table once the ledger spans two calendar months, whose plan columns count the whole
project by event month. Never locks, never mutates the manifest.
What the report says about test runs
Earned by a pointer and by nothing else. A subject carries testEvidence once a run has
been recorded against it, and a pointer — on a task or on a phase — is what turns this whole
surface on: the two filter rows, the phase marks, the drawer's third group and the Markdown
twin's column. The tests column itself is earned one step narrower, by a task carrying
one. A gate the plan merely declares earns nothing, deliberately: reading declarations
instead would put a column of No evidence on every manifest written before the field
existed, so a plan pointing at no recorded run renders exactly as it did before any of this
shipped, and upgrading the plugin changes not a byte of a report somebody already published.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 163 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A fce812ec137a
report is a command published in the GitHub repository AleksandarBisevac/claude-plugins (4 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 2,678 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
post
Post the current OCR review to a GitHub PR.
show
Display a past OCR review session.
history
List past OCR review sessions.
overlay-apply
Apply NIST 800-53 overlays (FedRAMP, DoD, Privacy, etc.) to existing baselines.
sdlc
Master orchestrator for the complete 5-phase SDLC pipeline. Runs all phases sequentially with approval gates and handoffs between each phase. Organizes artifacts into handoffs/, docs/, and projects/ directories.
pillar-guidance
Deep dive guidance on DORA's 5 pillars and implementation requirements.