Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Alenryuichi/openmemory-plusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/alenryuichi/openmemory-plus/bmad-review-adversarial-general)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alenryuichi/openmemory-plus/bmad-review-adversarial-general"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alenryuichi/openmemory-plus/bmad-review-adversarial-general/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alenryuichi/openmemory-plus/bmad-review-adversarial-general"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alenryuichi/openmemory-plus/bmad-review-adversarial-general.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00053 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00026 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00011 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00005 |
Grade A, and why
bmad-review-adversarial-general scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Adversarial Review (General)
Read the entire task file at: _bmad/core/tasks/review-adversarial-general.xml
Follow all instructions in the task file exactly as written.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 10 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A a0e0646ee45d
bmad-review-adversarial-general is a command published in the GitHub repository Alenryuichi/openmemory-plus (20 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 53 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor-clean
You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices. Analyze and refactor the provided code to improve its quality, maintainability, and performance.
delegate-review
Run OCR in delegation mode — OCR handles file selection and rules, the host agent performs the actual review.
sdd-explore
Explore and investigate an idea or feature — reads codebase and compares approaches.
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
gentle-sdd-ff
Fast-forward all SDD planning phases — proposal through tasks.
parallel-analyze
Multi-perspective analysis using parallel subagents. Analyzes code from architecture, security, performance, and testing viewpoints simultaneously.