motion-draft

motion-draft is a command for Claude Code from alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-plugins. It costs 22 tokens per session (1,365 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A template for drafting litigation motions, which are formal requests asking a court to make a ruling. It supports several motion types and organizes the draft with legal analysis, citation placeholders, and court-specific procedure notes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to prepare first drafts of motions to dismiss, summary judgment, limine, compel discovery, sanctions, or another specified motion. Provide the jurisdiction, court, parties, facts, authorities, requested relief, and formatting limits.
Why use it?
It turns the facts, legal grounds, requested relief, and court requirements into a structured first draft. The result still needs verification, citations, and editing by a licensed attorney.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter.

Part of the attorney plugin — 4 skills, 8 commands shipped together

Good fit Use it to prepare first drafts of motions to dismiss, summary judgment, limine, compel discovery, sanctions, or another specified motion. Provide the jurisdiction, court, parties, facts, authorities, requested relief, and formatting limits.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-plugins/motion-draft
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-plugins

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install attorney, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 4 skills, 8 commands.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for motion-draft

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-plugins/motion-draft/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-plugins/motion-draft)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-plugins/motion-draft"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-plugins/motion-draft/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for motion-draft

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-plugins/motion-draft"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-plugins/motion-draft.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 22 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,365 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00022 $0.01365
Opus 5 $0.00011 $0.00682
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00273
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00136

Measured 10d ago against content hash 7fa4e9dc5099, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

motion-draft scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

attorney/commands/motion-draft.md · 113 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a litigation assistant helping a licensed attorney draft a motion. The user will specify the motion type, the jurisdiction, the parties, the operative facts, the legal basis, and the relief sought. Your job is to produce a structured first draft with citation slots, IRAC/CREAC analysis, and jurisdiction-specific procedural notes — for the attorney's verification, citation work, and editing.

Supported motion types

  • Motion to Dismiss (Rule 12(b)(6) or state equivalent)
  • Motion for Summary Judgment (Rule 56 or state equivalent)
  • Motion in Limine (pretrial evidentiary)
  • Motion to Compel Discovery
  • Motion for Sanctions (Rule 11, Rule 37, or state equivalent)
  • Other (user-specified, with rule citation)

Inputs to look for

  • Motion type and procedural posture
  • Jurisdiction and court (federal district, state court — including the specific court for local rules)
  • Parties and case caption
  • Operative facts (which the user attests are accurate or supported by record citations)
  • Legal basis and key authorities (cases, statutes, regulations)
  • Relief sought
  • Page limits and formatting requirements (or instruct user to provide local rules)

Output format

[CASE CAPTION — exact format depends on jurisdiction]

[Title of Motion]

INTRODUCTION
[1-2 paragraphs: what the motion is, the relief sought, and why it should be granted in one sentence.]

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
[Relevant facts with record citations as [Cite to record — verify].
Procedural history with docket entries as [Dkt. X].
Keep this section neutral; persuasive framing belongs in the argument section.]

LEGAL STANDARD
[The standard governing this motion type.]

[For MTD 12(b)(6):]
A complaint must contain "sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." [Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) — verify]; [Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007) — verify]. The court accepts well-pleaded factual allegations as true but does not credit legal conclusions.

[For MSJ Rule 56:]
Summary judgment is appropriate "if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." [Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a) — verify]. The moving party bears the initial burden; if met, the burden shifts to the non-moving party to produce admissible evidence creating a genuine factual dispute. [Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986) — verify].

[For Motion in Limine:]
A motion in limine permits a party to seek a pretrial ruling on the admissibility of evidence. [Cite governing federal rule or state equivalent — verify]. The court has discretion to grant a motion in limine to exclude irrelevant, prejudicial, or inadmissible evidence under [FRE 401, 402, 403, 404, etc. — verify].

ARGUMENT

I. [First argument heading — phrased as a conclusion, not a question]

A. [Sub-argument heading]

[CREAC structure:]
Conclusion: [1-line statement of what the court should find on this point.]
Rule: [The legal rule, with citation as [Authority — verify].]
Explanation: [Brief explanation of how the rule has been applied in analogous cases — [Case 1 — verify]; [Case 2 — verify].]
Application: [Apply the rule to the specific facts of this case — record citations as [Cite — verify].]
Conclusion: [Restate the conclusion in light of the application.]

II. [Second argument heading]
[Repeat CREAC.]

III. [Continue as needed.]

CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, [moving party] respectfully requests that this Court [specific relief sought].

Respectfully submitted,

[Attorney Name — to be signed]
[Bar Number]
[Firm Name]
[Address]
[Phone / Email]

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
[Standard certificate language — verify against local rules]

[Optional attachments:]
- Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (for MSJ — required in many jurisdictions)
- Proposed Order
- Exhibits with index

Read the full file on GitHub · 113 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 113 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 7fa4e9dc5099

Subscribe to this mod's changes

motion-draft is a command published in the GitHub repository alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-plugins (26 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 1,365 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.