Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexeykrol/claude-code-starterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/alexeykrol/claude-code-starter/refactor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alexeykrol/claude-code-starter/refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alexeykrol/claude-code-starter/refactor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alexeykrol/claude-code-starter/refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alexeykrol/claude-code-starter/refactor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00447 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00179 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00089 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 65 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 384b82e91d8d
refactor is a command published in the GitHub repository alexeykrol/claude-code-starter (194 stars, last pushed 9d ago), with no licence file. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 447 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
fix
A code-repair command that detects and fixes errors reported by language servers, linters, or type checkers. These tools find code problems such as invalid syntax, style issues, and mismatched data types.
loop
A command that repeatedly works through reported issues until they are fixed or a set iteration limit is reached.
clean
A command for finding code that is no longer used and removing it after checking that tests still pass.
vouch-resolve-issue
Use vouch's KB to ground a fix for a GitHub issue.
brownfield-dead
Identify all dead code in the codebase: unused files and unused exports.
brownfield-score
Detailed risk scoring breakdown for a specific file. Shows all contributing factors and project comparison.