Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexsds/ade-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/alexsds/ade-workflow/status)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alexsds/ade-workflow/status"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alexsds/ade-workflow/status/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alexsds/ade-workflow/status"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alexsds/ade-workflow/status.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00193 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00077 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00039 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
status scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are reporting ADE workflow status.
Step 1: Find active plan
Look in .ade/docs/plans/ for any plan files. If none exist, tell the user no active plan exists.
Step 2: Read plan details
Read the plan file. Report:
- Project name and date
- Plan status (draft/approved/in-progress/completed/archived)
- Ticket number (if jira style)
Step 3: Report feature progress
List each feature/phase from the plan. For each, check git log for related commits to determine what has been implemented.
Step 4: Report recent evaluator scores
If the build is in progress, check for any evaluator feedback in recent conversation or committed files. Report last known scores.
Step 5: Identify blockers
Note any features that appear incomplete or where the evaluator reported failures that haven't been addressed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A fce26f78edba
status is a command published in the GitHub repository alexsds/ade-workflow (1 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 193 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
scout-meta-review
Run an interactive Scout meta-review — a system-level audit that sits above the individual session types. Checks whether sessions are running, mistake audit is trending well, proposals are flowing, KB files are healthy, and data-source coverage is consistent across session types. Runs in the current conversation.
scout-work
Interactive work session — walks through today's actionable items one at a time, presents a recommended action with draft content, and executes each one only with explicit approval. Runs in the current conversation (not as a background session).
execute
Execute the next available tracked task with TDD, pre-commit validation, PR creation, AI code review, and issue tracker bridge sync.
phase
Orchestrate a full roadmap phase. Designs features, imports to tracker, creates issues, then executes.
dashboard
Compact visual progress dashboard with progress bar, task table, dependency graph, and active/blocked/next status.
ccc-improve
Run the continuous-improvement pipeline: scan GitHub and npm for new Claude Code tooling, score proposals, and approve or reject them in a local queue. Use when reviewing ecosystem findings or deciding what to adopt next.