speckit.companion.after-plan

speckit.companion.after-plan is a command for Claude Code from alfredoperez/speckit-companion. It costs 22 tokens per session (532 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A lifecycle command that records when a planned feature reaches the planning stage in a project-status file. It updates the SpecKit Companion graphical interface with that state.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after a plan is created to write a completed planning transition to `.spec-context.json`.
Why use it?
It keeps the companion interface in sync with the planning workflow without requiring someone to update status by hand.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code command (commands/*.md).

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is python3 .specify/extensions/companion/scripts/write-context.py --step plan --status planned --kind complete --by extension.

Good fit Use it after a plan is created to write a completed planning transition to .spec-context.json.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alfredoperez/speckit-companion
agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/alfredoperez/speckit-companion/speckit.companion.after-plan

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for speckit.companion.after-plan

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alfredoperez/speckit-companion/speckit.companion.after-plan/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/alfredoperez/speckit-companion/speckit.companion.after-plan)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alfredoperez/speckit-companion/speckit.companion.after-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alfredoperez/speckit-companion/speckit.companion.after-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for speckit.companion.after-plan

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alfredoperez/speckit-companion/speckit.companion.after-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alfredoperez/speckit-companion/speckit.companion.after-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 22 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 532 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00022 $0.00532
Opus 5 $0.00011 $0.00266
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00106
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00053

Measured 2d ago against content hash c2d4041700d0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

speckit.companion.after-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

speckit-extension/commands/speckit.companion.after-plan.md · 53 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 53 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Capture Plan Context

Record the active feature's plan completion into .spec-context.json so the SpecKit Companion GUI re-renders with the correct step and status. This command runs as the after_plan lifecycle hook — state-writing only; the plan document is created by the core speckit.plan workflow.

Prerequisites

  • Verify Python is available by running python3 --version.
  • If python3 is not available, warn the user and skip the capture: [companion] Warning: python3 not detected; skipped .spec-context.json capture. Do not fail the host command.

Execution

Run the writer script from the repository root:

python3 .specify/extensions/companion/scripts/write-context.py --step plan --status planned --kind complete --by extension

--kind complete records the plan step's completion boundary (the plan body already recorded the step's start when it began), so the extension stamps both ends of the span in order. The completion append is idempotent — a re-fired hook never doubles it.

The script resolves the active feature directory on its own, in this order: --feature-dirSPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY env → SPECIFY_FEATURE env → .specify/feature.json → current git branch prefix.

If you already know the feature directory (e.g. the one speckit.plan just wrote into), pass it explicitly so resolution is unambiguous:

python3 .specify/extensions/companion/scripts/write-context.py --feature-dir specs/<NNN>-<slug> --step plan --status planned --kind complete --by extension

Graceful Degradation

The script is best-effort and never fails the host command:

  • If python3 is missing, skip with the warning above.
  • If the active feature directory cannot be resolved, the script prints a warning to stderr and exits 0 without writing.

Output

On success the script prints the path it updated and the values written, e.g.: [companion] Updated specs/<NNN>-<slug>/.spec-context.json (currentStep=plan, status=planned, kind=complete, by=extension). The write is atomic (temp file + rename) and appends to the canonical history[] without rewriting existing entries.

Read the full file on GitHub · 53 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago Changed c2d4041700d0
  2. 9d ago First seen · 53 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 88f9f78e4c85

Subscribe to this mod's changes

speckit.companion.after-plan is a command published in the GitHub repository alfredoperez/speckit-companion (90 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 532 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.