Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to alirezarezvani/claude-code-aso-skill. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/alirezarezvani/claude-code-aso-skill/main/.claude/commands/aso/aso-full-audit.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-code-aso-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/alirezarezvani/claude-code-aso-skill/aso-full-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alirezarezvani/claude-code-aso-skill/aso-full-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alirezarezvani/claude-code-aso-skill/aso-full-audit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.01555 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00777 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00311 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00155 |
Grade A, and why
aso-full-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 204 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A c8fd803a0e67
aso-full-audit is a command published in the GitHub repository alirezarezvani/claude-code-aso-skill (431 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 1,555 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
legal
Primary entry point for all BetterCallClaude requests — classifies intent, resolves jurisdiction (via swiss-legal-research), runs inline briefing for complexity 4–6, activates full briefing session when complexity ≥ 7 (via legal-intake skill), and routes to specialist agents or workflow pipelines. Invoked explicitly…
briefing
Structured pre-execution briefing session -- collects case context through specialist panel, builds execution plan, supports resume and depth control.
help
Show complete BetterCallClaude command reference, available agents, skills, and usage examples.
legal-5step
Execute the BetterCallClaude 5-step Swiss legal framework: intake → research → strategy → adversarial → draft. A complete end-to-end pipeline for any Swiss legal matter, from document analysis through final legal output.
legal-loop
Iterate a worker-evaluator cycle against a Goal Record until the success condition is met or a stop limit is reached. The evaluator (a different agent than the worker) judges each iteration using MCP verification tools. Produces an auditable verdict trail and a final MET / NOT MET status.
workflow
Define and execute multi-agent legal workflows -- due diligence, litigation prep, contract lifecycle, real estate closing.