claude-skills is a large collection of reusable skills, commands, plugins, and supporting resources for coding agents across engineering, business, research, compliance, and productivity work. It is used by people who want agents such as Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, or Cursor to follow specialized workflows. The catalogue contains selected skills and settings from the collection.
Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skillsnpx agentmods add commands/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/plugin-auditWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/plugin-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/plugin-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/plugin-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/plugin-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/plugin-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.01539 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00616 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00308 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00154 |
Grade A, and why
plugin-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- plugin-audit — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- plugin-audit — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 154 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Run the comprehensive plugin audit pipeline on the skill at $ARGUMENTS. If no argument provided, ask the user for the skill path.
Execute all 8 phases sequentially. Auto-fix non-critical issues. Only prompt the user for critical decisions (external dependencies, security findings, breaking changes).
Phase 1: Discovery
- Verify
$ARGUMENTSexists and containsSKILL.md. If not, error and stop. - Read
SKILL.mdfrontmatter — extractname,description,Category,Tier. - Detect components:
scripts/*.py→ Python tools (count them)references/*.md→ reference docs (count them)assets/→ templates/samplesexpected_outputs/→ test fixturesagents/*.md→ embedded agentsskills/*/SKILL.md→ sub-skills (compound skill).claude-plugin/plugin.json→ standalone pluginsettings.json→ command registrations
- Detect domain from path (
engineering/,product-team/,marketing-skill/, etc.) - Search
commands/for a.mdfile matching the skill name. - Display discovery summary.
Phase 2: Structure Validation
Run:
python3 engineering/skill-tester/scripts/skill_validator.py $ARGUMENTS --json
Parse JSON. If score < 75:
- Auto-fix missing frontmatter fields, missing section headings, missing directories.
- Re-run. If still < 75, mark as FAIL but continue collecting results.
Phase 3: Quality Scoring
Run:
python3 engineering/skill-tester/scripts/quality_scorer.py $ARGUMENTS --detailed --json
Parse JSON. If score < 60, report improvement roadmap items.
Phase 4: Script Testing
If $ARGUMENTS/scripts/ contains .py files, run:
python3 engineering/skill-tester/scripts/script_tester.py $ARGUMENTS --json --verbose
All scripts must PASS. If any script uses external imports, ask the user whether the dependency is acceptable.
Phase 5: Security Audit
Run:
python3 engineering/skill-security-auditor/scripts/skill_security_auditor.py $ARGUMENTS --strict --json
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 154 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A cd656f6c9fe7
plugin-audit is a command published in the GitHub repository alirezarezvani/claude-skills (28,240 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 1,539 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
validate-pr-description
Use when validating a PR title and description for conventional commit format, issue linking keywords, and template compliance before submission.
analyst
Use when performing local analyst review before pushing PR changes. Assesses code quality, impact analysis, and maintainability.
review-feedback
Review a given code review markdown document, GitHub PR review, or inline feedback — corroborate each point against actual code, then implement valid changes.
address
Address code review feedback — corroborate, validate, and implement changes from a review's final.md.
translate-review-to-single-human
Translate a multi-reviewer code review into a single human-voice GitHub PR comment.
qa-loop
Autonomous loop AUDIT (parallel) → VALIDATE → FIX → VERIFY → CHECK with stopping criteria.