Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to alonf/specrew. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/alonf/specrew/main/.specify/extensions/specrew-speckit/commands/speckit.specrew-speckit.sync-plan.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alonf/specrewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/alonf/specrew/speckit.specrew-speckit.sync-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alonf/specrew/speckit.specrew-speckit.sync-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alonf/specrew/speckit.specrew-speckit.sync-plan.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00462 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00231 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00092 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
speckit.specrew-speckit.sync-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to speckit.specrew-speckit.sync-clarify — 16 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Sync Plan Boundary State
Record the arrival (before the advancement gate)
After /speckit.plan updates plan.md, record the boundary arrival FIRST — the sync mints the
pending crossing and writes .specrew/runtime/pending-verdict-stop.md, the controller truth the
verdict stop renders from (DRIFT-198-I011-012: gating before the sync left the stop with no
artifact, the marker-invention precondition):
$featureJson = Get-Content -LiteralPath .\.specify\feature.json -Raw -Encoding UTF8 | ConvertFrom-Json
$featureRef = Split-Path -Leaf $featureJson.feature_directory
pwsh -File .\.specify\extensions\specrew-speckit\scripts\sync-boundary-state.ps1 -ProjectPath . -BoundaryType plan -FeatureRef $featureRef
If the sync fails, stop and report the exact file-write error before continuing. If the sync is refused because an earlier crossing is still unapproved (the ratchet), that refusal IS the stop — surface it and wait for the human; do not work around it.
Advancement gate (after the arrival is recorded)
The gate BLOCKS until the human's verdict authorizes this crossing:
. .\.specify\extensions\specrew-speckit\scripts\shared-governance.ps1
$authorization = Test-SpecrewBoundaryAuthorization -ProjectRoot . -CurrentBoundary 'clarify' -RequestedBoundary 'plan'
if (-not $authorization.Authorized) {
Write-Output (Write-SpecrewBoundaryAuthorizationDirective -CurrentBoundary $authorization.CurrentBoundary -RequestedBoundary $authorization.RequestedBoundary -DirectiveSentinel $authorization.DirectiveSentinel)
throw $authorization.Reason
}
On a gate block, .specrew/runtime/pending-verdict-stop.md is the controller truth: render the
six-section boundary packet from its Boundary to ask for, Human approval phrase, and
Marker last line exactly values, then stop for the human's verdict. Do not infer a marker from
the phase you are in.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 41 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A f65fd9b2820f
speckit.specrew-speckit.sync-plan is a command published in the GitHub repository alonf/specrew (54 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 462 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to speckit.specrew-speckit.sync-clarify, differing in 16 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
template
Manage issue templates for streamlined issue creation.
sync-linear
Sync current work with Linear ticket status.
add-note
Add an internal or external note to a ConnectWise PSA ticket.
fest-show
Show festival progression (in-progress tasks, roadmap, and dependency view).
dispatcher
Pick the next-best repo to work on across the portfolio — rank free repos, recommend one, claim its lease atomically, and route to the entry command.
workpm
A project-management workflow for coordinating multiple AI workers through five stages. It includes task assignment, shared activity logs, worker replacement, and final checks.