Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alonf/specrewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/alonf/specrew/speckit.specrew-speckit.sync-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alonf/specrew/speckit.specrew-speckit.sync-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alonf/specrew/speckit.specrew-speckit.sync-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alonf/specrew/speckit.specrew-speckit.sync-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alonf/specrew/speckit.specrew-speckit.sync-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00445 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00178 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00089 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
speckit.specrew-speckit.sync-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to speckit.specrew-speckit.sync-clarify — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Sync Plan Boundary State
Record the arrival (before the advancement gate)
After /speckit.plan updates plan.md, record the boundary arrival FIRST — the sync mints the
pending crossing and writes .specrew/runtime/pending-verdict-stop.md, the controller truth the
verdict stop renders from. This arrival-first order prevents a stop with no artifact:
$featureJson = Get-Content -LiteralPath .\.specify\feature.json -Raw -Encoding UTF8 | ConvertFrom-Json
$featureRef = Split-Path -Leaf $featureJson.feature_directory
pwsh -File .\.specify\extensions\specrew-speckit\scripts\sync-boundary-state.ps1 -ProjectPath . -BoundaryType plan -FeatureRef $featureRef
If the sync fails, stop and report the exact file-write error before continuing. If the sync is refused because an earlier crossing is still unapproved (the ratchet), that refusal IS the stop — surface it and wait for the human; do not work around it.
Advancement gate (after the arrival is recorded)
The gate BLOCKS until the human's verdict authorizes this crossing:
. .\.specify\extensions\specrew-speckit\scripts\shared-governance.ps1
$authorization = Test-SpecrewBoundaryAuthorization -ProjectRoot . -CurrentBoundary 'clarify' -RequestedBoundary 'plan'
if (-not $authorization.Authorized) {
Write-Output (Write-SpecrewBoundaryAuthorizationDirective -CurrentBoundary $authorization.CurrentBoundary -RequestedBoundary $authorization.RequestedBoundary -DirectiveSentinel $authorization.DirectiveSentinel)
throw $authorization.Reason
}
On a gate block, .specrew/runtime/pending-verdict-stop.md is the controller truth: render the
six-section boundary packet from its Boundary to ask for, Human approval phrase, and
Marker last line exactly values, then stop for the human's verdict. Do not infer a marker from
the phase you are in.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago Changed · -1 lines b9f7381b6a1d
- 2mo ago First seen · 41 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A f65fd9b2820f
speckit.specrew-speckit.sync-plan is a command published in the GitHub repository alonf/specrew (54 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 445 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to speckit.specrew-speckit.sync-clarify, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.
speckit.specrew-speckit.sync-plan compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| speckit.specrew-speckit.sync-planalonf/specrew | Command | 54 | yesterday | MIT | A | 10 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |