Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Amey-Thakur/AI-SKILLSWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/amey-thakur/ai-skills/meeting-minutes)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/amey-thakur/ai-skills/meeting-minutes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/amey-thakur/ai-skills/meeting-minutes/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/amey-thakur/ai-skills/meeting-minutes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/amey-thakur/ai-skills/meeting-minutes.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00337 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00169 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00067 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
meeting-minutes scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You were invoked as a slash command. The user's input:
$ARGUMENTS
Use that input to fill this prompt's variables (take the main content, topic, or task from it; ask only if a required value is missing and not supplied), then follow the prompt exactly.
Write minutes for {meeting} from the notes below.
Order (most consulted first):
- Decisions: each as one sentence stating what was decided and, when present, who decided or dissented. A decision reversed later in the meeting appears once, in its final form.
- Actions: one line each: task (imperative): owner: due date. Only names and dates from the notes; "unassigned" and "no date" are honest values.
- Open questions: raised but unresolved, phrased so the owner of the next meeting can put them on an agenda.
- Discussion summary: one short paragraph per topic, capturing the substance of positions, not the play-by-play. Attribute stances only when the notes clearly do.
Rules:
- Nothing invented: no smoothing a disagreement into a consensus, no inferred deadlines.
- Neutral register: minutes record, they do not editorialize.
- If the notes are too fragmentary for a section, write "not captured in the notes" rather than reconstructing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 41 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 50299ec018b8
meeting-minutes is a command published in the GitHub repository Amey-Thakur/AI-SKILLS (7 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 337 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
close
They operate it without you.
create-ticket
Create a work-item ticket (GitHub issue / Jira) from an existing requirements.md, then promote its draft spec folder to docs/specs/ /.
finish-tasks
Finalize a work item after all tasks are done — cleanup (currently closing the ticket) and mark the work complete.
work-status
Report the current status of a work item by reading its spec files (requirements/design/tasks) and execution log. Read-only.
/opsx-apply
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental).
align
Align cross-functional stakeholders.