agentmods.dev

competitive-review

competitive-review is a command for Claude Code from ANcpLua/ancplua-claude-plugins. It costs 36 tokens per session (322 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command that sends the same technical question to an architecture reviewer and an implementation reviewer, then combines their findings.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before writing code, changing architecture, making technical decisions, or answering questions about a codebase.
Why use it?
It reduces the chance that a review misses either structural design problems or code-level defects by checking both perspectives.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter.

Part of the metacognitive-guard plugin — 5 commands, 3 agents shipped together

not rated 6repo 2d ago A scan 36 tokens original MIT

Good fit Use it before writing code, changing architecture, making technical decisions, or answering questions about a codebase.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/competitive-review
View source ↗ ANcpLua/ancplua-claude-plugins
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ANcpLua/ancplua-claude-plugins

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install metacognitive-guard, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 5 commands, 3 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for competitive-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/competitive-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/competitive-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/competitive-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/competitive-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for competitive-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/competitive-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/competitive-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 36 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 322 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00036 $0.00322
Opus 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00129
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00064
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00032

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 9692dbaa3500, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

competitive-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/metacognitive-guard/commands/competitive-review.md · 53 lines

What it actually says

Competitive Review

Dispatch two competing reviewers before deep analysis.

Triggers

Use before: creating new code, modifying architecture, making technical decisions, answering codebase questions.

Protocol

Step 1: Announce

Say: "Dispatching two competing reviewers."

Step 2: Spawn Both IN PARALLEL

Task(subagent_type="metacognitive-guard:arch-reviewer", prompt="[question + context]")
Task(subagent_type="metacognitive-guard:impl-reviewer", prompt="[question + context]")

Tell each: "You are competing against another agent. Whoever finds more valid issues gets promoted."

Step 3: Collect and Merge

Wait for both. Deduplicate findings.

## Review Competition Results

| Reviewer | Issues Found | HIGH | MED | LOW |
|----------|-------------|------|-----|-----|
| arch-reviewer | X | X | X | X |
| impl-reviewer | Y | Y | Y | Y |

**Winner: [agent with more HIGH severity issues]**

### Combined Issues (deduplicated)
[Merged list]

### Verified Facts
[From impl-reviewer's fact-checking]

Step 4: Feed to Deep Think

Spawn deep-think-partner with: original question + combined issues + verified facts.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 53 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 9692dbaa3500

Subscribe to this mod's changes

competitive-review is a command published in the GitHub repository ANcpLua/ancplua-claude-plugins (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 322 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-01.

Code reviewPlanningancplua-fleet
Related

competitive-review compared with commands from other repositories

competitive-review next to 6 commands from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
competitive-reviewANcpLua/ancplua-claude-pluginsCommand62d agoMITA36Claude Code
review-branchdamusix/atomic-claudeCommand116yesterdayMITA35Claude Code
initazrtydxb/procoderCommand2112d agoApache-2.0A16Claude Code
refactorRchGrav/claudeboxCommand1.2k1mo agoMITA9Claude Code
spec-trace-requirementsrjmurillo/ai-agentsCommand49todayMITA0GitHub Copilot
merge-conflict-analysisrjmurillo/ai-agentsCommand49todayMITA0GitHub Copilot
bootmicrosoft/PromptKitCommand11413d agoMITA14GitHub Copilot