Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ANcpLua/ancplua-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/council)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/council"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/council/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/council"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/council.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00094 | $0.01886 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00047 | $0.00943 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00377 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00189 |
Grade A, and why
council scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 150 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/council [task]
Invoke the council on [task].
Requirements
Agent teams are experimental and disabled by default. This command needs them:
{ "env": { "CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS": "1" } }
Without it, no team is set up at session start, and the lead can neither spawn teammates nor propose them. Check this first and fail loudly — a silent fallback to fire-and-forget subagents removes the synthesizer↔clarity cross-talk that is the entire point of the council.
When to use
- Question requires both cited evidence (research) and rigorous reasoning (logic)
- Answer needs gap-checking before delivery
- Task is complex enough that a single pass will miss something
- You want the synthesis reconciled live against the evidence before it ships
How it runs
captain = the session lead (Fable 5) — frames a research question
│
└── /deep-research <question> (dynamic workflow — fans out searches, returns a cited report)
│
└── captain spawns teammates; the team forms on the first spawn
│
├── synthesizer (Opus 5 teammate) reasons over the report + task
└── clarity (Opus 5 teammate) gap-checks the synthesis against the report
→ asks synthesizer live follow-ups via SendMessage
→ synthesizer responds in real time (reactive cross-pollination)
│
└── captain reads report + team messages → produces draft
│
└── janitor (Opus 5 teammate) → BLOAT_FLAG + CUTS via SendMessage
│
└── captain removes cuts → final output
│
└── shutdown requests; team dirs cleaned up on session exit
/deep-research is a dynamic workflow, not a live SendMessage teammate — it returns a report. The
live cross-pollination is between the synthesizer and clarity reconciling that report.
Orchestration
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 150 lines · 94 tokens per session scan A 5698260a7260
council is a command published in the GitHub repository ANcpLua/ancplua-claude-plugins (5 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 1,886 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.