Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ANcpLua/ancplua-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/council)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/council"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/council/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/council"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/council.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00094 | $0.01886 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00754 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00377 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00189 |
Grade A, and why
council scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 150 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/council [task]
Invoke the council on [task].
Requirements
Agent teams are experimental and disabled by default. This command needs them:
{ "env": { "CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS": "1" } }
Without it, no team is set up at session start, and the lead can neither spawn teammates nor propose them. Check this first and fail loudly — a silent fallback to fire-and-forget subagents removes the synthesizer↔clarity cross-talk that is the entire point of the council.
When to use
- Question requires both cited evidence (research) and rigorous reasoning (logic)
- Answer needs gap-checking before delivery
- Task is complex enough that a single pass will miss something
- You want the synthesis reconciled live against the evidence before it ships
How it runs
captain = the session lead (Fable 5) — frames a research question
│
└── /deep-research <question> (dynamic workflow — fans out searches, returns a cited report)
│
└── captain spawns teammates; the team forms on the first spawn
│
├── synthesizer (Opus 5 teammate) reasons over the report + task
└── clarity (Opus 5 teammate) gap-checks the synthesis against the report
→ asks synthesizer live follow-ups via SendMessage
→ synthesizer responds in real time (reactive cross-pollination)
│
└── captain reads report + team messages → produces draft
│
└── janitor (Opus 5 teammate) → BLOAT_FLAG + CUTS via SendMessage
│
└── captain removes cuts → final output
│
└── shutdown requests; team dirs cleaned up on session exit
/deep-research is a dynamic workflow, not a live SendMessage teammate — it returns a report. The
live cross-pollination is between the synthesizer and clarity reconciling that report.
Orchestration
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 150 lines · 94 tokens per session scan A 5698260a7260
council is a command published in the GitHub repository ANcpLua/ancplua-claude-plugins (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 1,886 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
council compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| councilANcpLua/ancplua-claude-plugins | Command | 6 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 94 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |
| speckit.bug.fixgithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 12 | Claude Code |