review

review is a command for Claude Code from ANcpLua/ancplua-claude-plugins. It costs 12 tokens per session (551 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review command that examines selected files or changes for security problems, style issues, performance risks, and other defects.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review uncommitted or staged changes, a file, a directory, or changes on a branch.
Why use it?
It helps find important problems before code is merged or shipped, including unsafe input handling, exposed secrets, and inefficient database use.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter.

Part of the feature-dev plugin — 2 commands, 3 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to review uncommitted or staged changes, a file, a directory, or changes on a branch.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ANcpLua/ancplua-claude-plugins

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install feature-dev, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 2 commands, 3 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 12 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 551 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00012 $0.00551
Opus 5.5 $0.00005 $0.00220
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00002 $0.00110
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00055

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 2db73e0792ee, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/feature-dev/commands/review.md · 85 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review code for security vulnerabilities, style issues, performance problems, and best practices.

Usage

/review [target]

Targets

  • /review - Review all uncommitted changes.
  • /review file.ts - Review a specific file.
  • /review src/ - Review all files in a directory.
  • /review --staged - Review only staged changes.
  • /review --branch=feature - Review changes in a branch.

Workflow

1. Gather Context

git diff --stat
git diff

Understand: purpose of changes, affected files, expected behavior.

2. Security Audit

Check for: injection vulnerabilities (SQL, command, XSS), authentication/authorization flaws, hardcoded secrets, missing input validation, insecure dependencies.

Common patterns:

  • SQL injection — Bad: string concatenation in queries. Good: parameterized queries.
  • XSS — Bad: innerHTML = userInput. Good: textContent = userInput.
  • Missing error handling — Bad: bare JSON.parse(input). Good: try/catch with typed exceptions.

3. Style Check

Verify: naming conventions, formatting consistency, necessary documentation, logical file organization.

4. Performance Review

Look for: N+1 queries, unnecessary computation, memory issues, blocking operations in async contexts, inefficient algorithms.

5. Best Practices

Check: error handling, logging levels, test coverage, DRY principle, single responsibility.

6. Generate Report

Severity Levels

Level Description Action
CRITICAL Security vulnerability, data loss Must fix now
HIGH Bugs, significant issues Fix before merge
MEDIUM Code quality, maintainability Fix soon
LOW Minor improvements Nice to have
INFO Observations, positive feedback No action needed

Checklist

  • Security vulnerabilities checked
  • Code style verified
  • Performance issues identified
  • Error handling reviewed
  • Test coverage assessed
  • Report generated with findings

Read the full file on GitHub · 85 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 85 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 2db73e0792ee

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a command published in the GitHub repository ANcpLua/ancplua-claude-plugins (6 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 551 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-01.

Related

review compared with commands from other repositories

review next to 6 commands from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
reviewANcpLua/ancplua-claude-pluginsCommand63d agoMITA12Claude Code
review-branchdamusix/atomic-claudeCommand1172d agoMITA35Claude Code
initazrtydxb/procoderCommand2113d agoApache-2.0A16Claude Code
refactorRchGrav/claudeboxCommand1.2k1mo agoMITA9Claude Code
spec-trace-requirementsrjmurillo/ai-agentsCommand49todayMITA0GitHub Copilot
merge-conflict-analysisrjmurillo/ai-agentsCommand49todayMITA0GitHub Copilot
bootmicrosoft/PromptKitCommand11415d agoMITA14GitHub Copilot