Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add ANcpLua/ancplua-claude-plugins/plugin install elegance-pipelineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/run)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/run"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/run/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/run"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/run.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00507 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00203 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00101 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
run scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run the next ready stage of the elegance pipeline.
Procedure
- Check status:
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/elegance_pipeline/pipeline.py [--state-dir <dir>] status
- For each ready slot, render the prompt:
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/elegance_pipeline/pipeline.py [--state-dir <dir>] prompt --role <role> --slot <slot>
-
Spawn the matching subagent with the rendered prompt as the task:
scout-*slots -> spawnelegance-pipeline:elegance-scout(or the exact fully qualified runtime ID if it differs)judge-*slots -> spawnelegance-pipeline:elegance-judge(or the exact fully qualified runtime ID if it differs)planner-1-> spawnelegance-pipeline:elegance-plannerverifier-1-> spawnelegance-pipeline:elegance-verifierimplementer-1-> spawnelegance-pipeline:elegance-implementer
-
After each agent completes, pipe its result to the state manager:
echo "<agent output>" | python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/elegance_pipeline/pipeline.py [--state-dir <dir>] submit \
--role <role> --slot <slot> --stdin
-
Check status again and repeat for newly unlocked slots.
-
Stop when no more slots are ready or the pipeline is complete.
Arguments
Pass $ARGUMENTS to control which stage to run:
scouts— run only scout phasejudges— run only judge phaseall— run all phases sequentially (default)- A specific slot like
scout-1orjudge-2
Rules
- Never bypass stage gates
- Run scouts and judges in parallel (background agents)
- Run planner, verifier, implementer sequentially (foreground)
- If the verifier says no implementation is warranted, report that and stop
- Use a distinct
--state-dirfor each spec if you want dedicated teams in parallel
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 57 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A b93fcdb77bbc
run is a command published in the GitHub repository ANcpLua/ancplua-claude-plugins (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 507 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-01.
run compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| runANcpLua/ancplua-claude-plugins | Command | 6 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 9 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |
| speckit.bug.fixgithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 12 | Claude Code |