Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/andreidavid/codex-review/codex-review-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andreidavid/codex-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/andreidavid/codex-review/codex-review-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/andreidavid/codex-review/codex-review-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/andreidavid/codex-review/codex-review-plan.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00846 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00423 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00169 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
codex-review-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Codex Plan Review
The user invoked this command with: $ARGUMENTS
Instructions
Review a Claude Code plan file with OpenAI Codex. The flow is on-demand and non-blocking — unlike the post-commit hook, it operates on markdown prose in ~/.claude/plans/ rather than a git diff.
1. Resolve the plan path
Parse $ARGUMENTS:
-
No argument — pick the most-recently-modified plan file:
ls -t ~/.claude/plans/*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1If the directory is empty or missing, tell the user "No plan files in
~/.claude/plans/." and stop. -
Argument contains
/— treat as an absolute path (or relative to the current working directory). Expand~yourself. -
Bare filename (no
/) — resolve against~/.claude/plans/<arg>. Append.mdif no extension.
Before proceeding, verify the resolved path exists and is non-empty:
[ -s "<PATH>" ] || { echo "Plan file <PATH> does not exist or is empty"; exit 1; }
If the file doesn't exist, tell the user the path you checked and stop without running Codex.
2. Run Codex against the plan
Invoke (honor $CODEX_BIN the same way the post-commit hook does, and pass --skip-git-repo-check so reviewing a plan works from any directory — scratch folders, non-git trees, etc.):
"${CODEX_BIN:-codex}" exec --full-auto --skip-git-repo-check "Review the implementation plan at <PATH>. Read it fully, then critique from these angles: missing steps or gaps; design flaws or wrong-architecture choices; scope creep or under-scoping; risks and unhandled edge cases; verification that's insufficient or missing. Format findings using priorities: [P1] = critical (the plan will fail or produce wrong outcomes as written), [P2] = important (will cause rework), [P3] = advisory. If nothing material is wrong, say so explicitly."
Notes:
- Substitute the resolved
<PATH>literally into the prompt so Codex can read the file from its sandbox. --full-autoruns sandboxed and non-interactive, matching the post-commit hook.--skip-git-repo-checkis required because Codex aborts in non-repo / untrusted-dir contexts by default; plan review has no git dependency so always skip the check.- Do not pass
--json— this command is interactive; the user reads the prose directly. - Expect 30–120 seconds for a moderate plan; complex plans can take longer.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 69 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A e5c0b7582a33
codex-review-plan is a command published in the GitHub repository andreidavid/codex-review (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 846 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
sm-sail
Command "sm-sail" from ScienceIsNeato/slop-mop, covering /sm-sail — drive a pr to green, autonomously, the loop, when sail parks on review threads, when to stop before "pr ready" — only two reasons and expect convergence, not one pass.
sm-buff
You usually don't run buff directly — run sm sail. sm sail drives the whole PR to green and calls buff watch / triage for you, stopping only when it needs you to act (see /sm-sail). Reach for sm buff here only for surgical work: inspecting a specific failure, or resolving a single review thread when sail has parked on…
sm-wake-angry-drunk-captain
The last-resort verb. Use it ONLY when the loop is genuinely exhausted: barnacles filed, gates green or truly unfixable, and the single remaining move is a human judgment call no sm verb can make for you.
sm-barnacle
Use when sm itself gives invalid guidance, blocks valid work, produces confusing output, or breaks install/upgrade/refit flow. Do not use this for real target-repo failures; fix those through the normal rail.
doctor
hi-vibe's own health check — actually runs hi-vibe's 5 hooks & scanner to catch silent failure. Not Claude Code's built-in /doctor (that one checks your CLI install).
sm-init
Run when you find a repo with sm installed but no .sbconfig.json — or after upgrading slopmop to pick up new gates.