Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andreilungeanu/codex-delegate-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/andreilungeanu/codex-delegate-mcp/delegate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/andreilungeanu/codex-delegate-mcp/delegate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/andreilungeanu/codex-delegate-mcp/delegate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/andreilungeanu/codex-delegate-mcp/delegate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/andreilungeanu/codex-delegate-mcp/delegate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00129 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00052 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00026 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
delegate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Follow the delegate skill (/codex-delegate:delegate or auto-invoked) for the full
workflow. Task: $ARGUMENTS
- Pass a self-contained inline brief in
spec(goal, scope, acceptance criteria) — do not create a spec file unless the user asks to persist it. - Call the
delegateMCP tool — do not invokecodexdirectly. - Review the diff and confirm acceptance criteria.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 12 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A def2e65991cc
delegate is a command published in the GitHub repository andreilungeanu/codex-delegate-mcp (2 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 129 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-pr
PR review using parallel specialized agents for code quality, security, testing, architecture, and performance analysis. Synthesizes findings into a review report with conventional comments (praise/issue/suggestion/nitpick) and approve or request-changes verdict. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting security…
assess
Assesses and rates quality 0-10 across multiple dimensions (correctness, maintainability, security, performance, testability, simplicity) with pros/cons analysis. Compares against project conventions and prior decisions from memory. Produces structured evaluation reports with actionable improvement suggestions. Use…
brainstorm
Design exploration using parallel agents through a 7-phase process: topic analysis, memory context, divergent ideation (10+ ideas), feasibility filtering, evaluation with devil's advocate scoring (0-10 across 7 dimensions), synthesis of top approaches, and trade-off comparison. Supports open exploration, constrained…
fix-issue
Fixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to…
implement
Full-power feature implementation using parallel subagents for backend, frontend, testing, and security, with worktree isolation and quality verification in one workflow. Chains with /ork:cover for tests and /ork:verify for validation. Use when asked to build, add, create, scaffold, or set up a new feature, endpoint…
verify
Grade work that already exists and decide whether it can merge. Runs the project's current unit, integration, and E2E suites plus security scanning and type checking, scores every dimension 0-10, and returns a merge verdict with a VERIFIED-vs-CLAIMED evidence manifest. Writes no test files and edits no source. Use…