Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/angelwzr/linux-phone-portingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/angelwzr/linux-phone-porting/evidence-sweep)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/angelwzr/linux-phone-porting/evidence-sweep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/angelwzr/linux-phone-porting/evidence-sweep/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/angelwzr/linux-phone-porting/evidence-sweep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/angelwzr/linux-phone-porting/evidence-sweep.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00462 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00231 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00092 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
evidence-sweep scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed CC-BY-4.0
The repository is licensed CC-BY-4.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · +2 lines 52864a86475b
- 11d ago First seen · 18 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 0c2fe3662a91
evidence-sweep is a command published in the GitHub repository angelwzr/linux-phone-porting (47 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed CC-BY-4.0. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 462 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
doctor
A command that diagnoses the Computer Use plugin, its environment, and its mapped capabilities. Computer Use lets an agent interact with a computer through supported actions.
quality-gate
Run formatter, linter, and type checks for a file or directory. Report remediation steps.
cleanup
Run a systematic cleanup on the provided code to resolve smells, simplify complexity, and enforce best practices.
debt-audit
Perform a technical debt audit on the specified components and generate a prioritized remediation roadmap.
refactor-plan
Draft a step-by-step refactoring strategy for complex code changes to ensure behavior is preserved.
dead-code
Hostile hunt for code that is unreferenced or unreachable — with the deletion-safety discipline that no symbol is called dead until every reachability channel is ruled out. Assume the codebase hides both cruft that should be deleted and live code that only looks dead; prove which is which. Grep-shows-no-callers is a…