Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anilcancakir/claude-code-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/anilcancakir/claude-code-plugin/wisdom)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/anilcancakir/claude-code-plugin/wisdom"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/anilcancakir/claude-code-plugin/wisdom/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/anilcancakir/claude-code-plugin/wisdom"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/anilcancakir/claude-code-plugin/wisdom.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01559 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00624 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00312 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00156 |
Grade A, and why
wisdom scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 162 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Wisdom
Post-execute report generation. Captures what was built, deviations applied, patterns discovered, and decisions deferred. Runs automatically at /ac:execute completion; can also run standalone against any status: complete plan.
Phase 1: Load
-
Parse
$ARGUMENTS:- File path → single-plan or Mode B phase wisdom.
- Directory path → multi-phase Mode A consolidation.
- Empty → Glob
.ac/plans/**/*.md, filterstatus: completewithout a SUMMARY alongside, pick the most recent. If more than one candidate, AskUserQuestion to pick.
-
Read the plan file (or all phase files for Mode A) and any existing SUMMARY / open-questions files.
-
Extract the
status: executingtimestamp from the frontmatter history or the first commit SHA matching the slug. This is the start of the execution window. -
Run Bash to collect commit and change data:
START_REF=<commit or ISO timestamp> git log --since="$START_REF" --oneline --no-merges | grep -E "<slug>" || \ git log --since="$START_REF" --oneline --no-merges git diff --stat "$START_REF"..HEAD -
Pre-invoke
Skill("my-language")for prose tone. Silent no-op if not installed. -
Parse the plan file's
Deviations LogandOpen Questionssections into structured lists for Phase 2 and Phase 3.
Phase 2: Generate SUMMARY.md
Target:
- Multi-phase Mode A:
.ac/plans/<slug>/SUMMARY.md(append or replace this phase's section). - Single-file or Mode B:
.ac/plans/<slug>-summary.md.
Format:
---
slug: <slug>
completed: <ISO date>
mode: <A | B | single>
phase: <N or "single">
task-count: <N>
deviations: <N>
commits: <N>
---
## What was built
One concise line per completed Task:
- Task 1 (<primary file>): <outcome in one sentence>
- Task 2 (<primary file>): <outcome>
## Key files changed
- `path/to/file.ts`, <what changed, why, one sentence>
- `path/to/other.php`, <what changed>
## Deviations applied
Grouped by rule:
- Rule 1 (bugs): <count>, examples: <one liner per notable case>
- Rule 2 (critical additions): <count>, examples
- Rule 3 (blocking fixes): <count>, examples
- Rule 4 (user asks): <count>, examples
## Patterns discovered
- Existing helper `path/to/x.ts:fnName` matched Task <N> needs, saved an implementation.
- <pattern name>, observed when <context>, reusable for <future scenario>.
## Verification status
- Per-task Verify commands: all passed.
- End-to-end Verification (from plan): <result>.
- Build: <pass | fail>.
- Lint: <zero warnings | N warnings>.
## Open questions forwarded
See `<path>/open-questions.md` or inline (single-file). Count: <N>.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 162 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 19466a3a4a92
wisdom is a command published in the GitHub repository anilcancakir/claude-code-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,559 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
perf-difficult-conversation
Three-conversations framework rehearsal (Stone/Patton/Heen — Harvard Negotiation Project) for high-stakes conversations — termination, demotion, hard feedback, conflict surfacing. Produces three-conversations breakdown (what-happened / feelings / identity), conversation script with multiple opening choices, SCARF…
culture-onboarding-90
Design a 90-day onboarding architecture for a role. First day (psychological safety + belonging activation), first week (relationship + role context + early wins), first month (skill ramp + integration + baseline), first quarter (autonomous performance + cultural integration check). Written-first elements for…
perf-coaching-protocol
Generate a 60-minute solution-focused + CBT-grounded coaching session script for a manager-as-coach engagement. Coaches use questions, not advice. Produces session structure (check-in → focus → scaling → exception-finding → small-step → close), follow-up prompts, and the manager-as-coach training notes that name the…
reclaim-knowledge
Organize scattered professional material into a domain-based second-brain architecture. Maps existing sources (Canva, Drive, local folders, Notion, screenshots) to functional domains. Non-technical-friendly — produces folder structure + drag-and-drop instructions, not CLI commands.
design-regimen
Design an integrated weekly regimen — training, nutrition, sleep, stress, recovery — matched to the person's actual life. Composes with gym-training-expert and health-nutrition-expert for domain detail. Produces a sustainable architecture, not an extreme program. Not medical advice.
hire-calibrate
Run the pre-loop calibration session — 60 minutes with ≥3 raters, review the rubric, score 2 anchor candidates the team has previously seen, surface inter-rater drift, agree on hire-bar examples. The calibration session itself is the deliverable. Without it, the loop runs on uncalibrated rulers. Per Project Oxygen …