Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to antosubash/SimpleModule. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antosubash/SimpleModule/main/.claude/commands/review-module.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/antosubash/SimpleModuleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/antosubash/simplemodule/review-module)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/antosubash/simplemodule/review-module"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/antosubash/simplemodule/review-module/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/antosubash/simplemodule/review-module"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/antosubash/simplemodule/review-module.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01994 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00798 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00399 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00199 |
Grade A, and why
review-module scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 140 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Convention review for a SimpleModule module. Checks the module against the Constitution and project conventions.
If no module name was supplied as an argument, ask: "Which module would you like to review? (e.g. Products, Orders)"
Work through all 7 areas below in order. Do not auto-fix violations — record them and report at the end. For each violation found, record: file path, approximate line or pattern, what's wrong, how to fix it.
Replace {Name} with the module name throughout.
Area 1 — Architecture: No impl→impl dependencies
Read modules/{Name}/src/SimpleModule.{Name}/SimpleModule.{Name}.csproj.
For every <ProjectReference> path in that file, check whether the path points into another module's implementation assembly. A violation is a path that:
- Contains
modules/(ormodules\) - Does NOT end with
.Contracts/SimpleModule.*.Contracts.csproj(or the backslash equivalent)
References to .Contracts projects are fine. References to the host or shared infrastructure are fine.
Violation fix: Replace the implementation reference with a reference to the other module's .Contracts project. Inject I{OtherModule}Contracts via constructor rather than using the concrete class directly.
Area 2 — Endpoints: CrudEndpoints helpers and TypedResults
Grep for MapGet|MapPost|MapPut|MapDelete in modules/{Name}/src/SimpleModule.{Name}/Endpoints/.
Check each match:
-
CrudEndpoints helpers — Standard CRUD operations should use
CrudEndpoints.GetAll,CrudEndpoints.GetById,CrudEndpoints.Create,CrudEndpoints.Update, orCrudEndpoints.Deleterather than raw inlineResults.*returns for the same operation. Flag any endpoint that manually reimplements what a CrudEndpoints helper already provides. -
TypedResults — API endpoints must use
TypedResults.*(e.g.,TypedResults.Ok(...),TypedResults.NotFound()) not the non-genericResults.*static methods. Flag any use ofResults.Ok,Results.NotFound, etc.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 140 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2d922cc61a44
review-module is a command published in the GitHub repository antosubash/SimpleModule (5 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,994 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor
Systematic code refactoring with smart scope detection.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
spec-trace-requirements
You are verifying that implementation changes trace back to specification requirements.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
boot
Start a new PromptKit prompt assembly session (alias for /bootstrap).