Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/apideck-libraries/api-skills/portman-initgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/apideck-libraries/api-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/apideck-libraries/api-skills/portman-init)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/apideck-libraries/api-skills/portman-init"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/apideck-libraries/api-skills/portman-init.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00335 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00168 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00067 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
portman-init scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Initialize Portman for Apideck API Testing
Generate a complete Portman configuration for testing an Apideck unified API:
- Accept the API name from arguments (e.g.,
crm,accounting,hris,file-storage,ats) - Create a
portman-config.jsonwith:- Contract tests enabled for all operations (status, content-type, JSON body, schema validation)
- Response time tests at 500ms threshold
- Variable chaining: capture
data.idfrom create operations for use in get/update/delete - Security overwrites for Bearer token from
{{bearerToken}}env var - Header overwrites for
x-apideck-app-id,x-apideck-consumer-id,x-apideck-service-id - A variation test for 401 Unauthorized with an invalid token
- An integration test for the primary resource lifecycle (create → get → update → delete)
- Create a
.envfile template withPORTMAN_BEARER_TOKEN,PORTMAN_APP_ID,PORTMAN_CONSUMER_ID,PORTMAN_SERVICE_ID - Create a
portman-cli-options.jsonpointing to the Apideck spec URL (https://specs.apideck.com/{api}.yml) - Show the command to run:
portman --cliOptionsFile ./portman-cli-options.json
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 22 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 684f77d8b659
portman-init is a command published in the GitHub repository apideck-libraries/api-skills (3 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 335 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
commit
Commit the current changes following the workflow-commit skill — Conventional Commit messages with a worktree-aware commit.sh signing handoff.
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.