component-analysis-block

component-analysis-block is a command for Claude Code from appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs. It costs 0 tokens per session (320 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A reusable command block for describing how a software component is built, including its structure, inputs, state, logic, and code location.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to analyse a feature or component and record how its parts work together.
Why use it?
It turns implementation details into a shared reference that is easier to inspect and maintain.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

Good fit Use it to analyse a feature or component and record how its parts work together.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs/component-analysis-block
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for component-analysis-block

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs/component-analysis-block/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs/component-analysis-block)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs/component-analysis-block"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs/component-analysis-block/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for component-analysis-block

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs/component-analysis-block"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs/component-analysis-block.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 320 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00320
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00160
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00064
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00032

Measured 9d ago against content hash b40d93a38aa0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

component-analysis-block scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/add/component-analysis-block.md · 43 lines

What it actually says

Block Command

When this command is used, use the following block. Acknowledge your understanding and then await the user's request.


## 🔬 Component Analysis
> 💡 *A detailed analysis of the implementation, including component hierarchy, state, props, and core logic. This section is typically generated by analysis or conversion processes.*

```
<example>
### Feature: [Name of Feature Analyzed]

**Component Hierarchy:**
[List the component structure]
- `[[ParentComponent]]`
  - `[[ChildComponentA]]`
  - `[[ChildComponentB]]`

---

### Component: `[Component Name]`
- **Location:** `[path/to/source/component]`
- **Purpose:** [Brief description of the component's responsibility]
- **Inputs/Props:**
    - `[propName]`: `[type]` - [Description of what this prop does]
    - `[anotherProp]`: `[type]` - [Description of another prop]
- **State:**
    - `[stateVariable]`: `[type]` - [Description of what this state tracks]
    - `[anotherState]`: `[type]` - [Description of another state variable]
- **Core Logic Summary:**
    [Explain the key logic, including lifecycle methods, event handlers, and data fetching]
- **Key Code Snippet:**
    ```[source_language]
    [A relevant snippet of the source component's code]
    ```
</example>
```

[Repeat the Component section above for all relevant components]
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 43 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b40d93a38aa0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

component-analysis-block is a command published in the GitHub repository appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs (85 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 320 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.