Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs/end-goal-block)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs/end-goal-block"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs/end-goal-block/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs/end-goal-block"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs/end-goal-block.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00266 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00106 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00053 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
tech-issue-template scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- main-goal-block — 88% identical, 6 lines differ
What it actually says
Block Command
When this command is used, use the following block. Acknowledge your understanding and then await the user's request.
## 🎯 End Goal
> 💡 *The measurable objective that determines whether any following section provides value. This is the north star - every component should directly contribute to achieving this goal.*
[Clear, measurable objective that defines success. Should be specific enough to validate achievement and guide all decisions about what to include or exclude]
### Deliverables
[What must be produced or accomplished]
```
<example>
- [Specific artifact or output to be created]
- [Document or report to be generated]
- [Analysis or solution to be provided]
- [Decision or recommendation to be made]
</example>
```
### Acceptance Criteria
[How to verify the goal has been achieved]
```
<example>
- [ ] [Specific condition that confirms success]
- [ ] [Quality metric that must be met]
- [ ] [Performance threshold achieved]
- [ ] [Stakeholder requirement satisfied]
</example>
```
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 41 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A e51c14345763
tech-issue-template is a command published in the GitHub repository appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs (87 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 266 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
decision
Record, list, and manage project decisions with rationale tracking.
prime
Load AI-optimized workflow context for beads issue tracking.
search
Search issues by text query.
workflow
Show the AI-supervised issue workflow guide.
ready
Find ready-to-work tasks with no blockers.
create-plan
Writes an implementation plan as a file artifact in the task directory (.ork/tasks/TASK/NN-plan-SLUG.md) with phases, exact file changes and runnable success criteria, so reviewers comment on the file instead of in chat. Use when a task has its research done and needs a reviewable plan before code; pair with…