docs-mcp-server: Command for GitHub Copilot

.github/prompts/opsx-explore.prompt.md

opsx-explore is a command for GitHub Copilot from arabold/docs-mcp-server. It costs 13 tokens per session (4,118 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An OpenSpec exploration workflow for investigating ideas, reading code, and clarifying requirements without implementing features. OpenSpec is a system for recording planned software changes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect a codebase, ask design questions, and update planning artifacts; move to the proposal workflow when implementation should be planned.
Why use it?
It provides a safe place to understand a problem and develop a plan without accidentally changing the project.

Command for GitHub Copilot

Written for GitHub Copilot: a Copilot chat mode or prompt.

This is arabold/docs-mcp-server's own configuration. It tells GitHub Copilot how to work on docs-mcp-server itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything docs-mcp-server configures →

About the project

Grounded Docs is an MCP server that builds a local, version-aware index of documentation from websites, code repositories, package registries, local files, and archives for AI coding assistants. It helps assistants retrieve current project-specific documentation and supports MCP-compatible clients such as Claude, Cline, and similar tools. The catalogue add-ons provide skills, commands, and instructions for working with this documentation server.

arabold/docs-mcp-server · 1,813 stars · on GitHub · grounded.tools

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to arabold/docs-mcp-server. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/arabold/docs-mcp-server/main/.github/prompts/opsx-explore.prompt.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arabold/docs-mcp-server

Made for: GitHub Copilot.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for opsx-explore

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/arabold/docs-mcp-server/opsx-explore/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/arabold/docs-mcp-server/opsx-explore)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/arabold/docs-mcp-server/opsx-explore"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/arabold/docs-mcp-server/opsx-explore/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for opsx-explore

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/arabold/docs-mcp-server/opsx-explore"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/arabold/docs-mcp-server/opsx-explore.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 13 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,118 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00013 $0.04118
Opus 5.5 $0.00005 $0.01647
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00824
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00412

Measured 28d ago against content hash 31e800c5db8f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

opsx-explore scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 28d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

.github/prompts/opsx-explore.prompt.md · 236 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 236 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Enter explore mode. Think deeply. Visualize freely. Follow the conversation wherever it goes.

IMPORTANT: Explore mode is for thinking, not implementing. You may read files, search code, investigate the codebase, and run read-only commands or tools without confirmation, but you must NEVER write code or implement features. If the user asks you to implement something, do not start it here: say that explore mode does not implement, and point them at /opsx-propose, which turns the discussion into a change. The work happens from that change, never from explore mode. You MAY create or update OpenSpec change artifacts (proposals, designs, specs) within a confirmed scope—that's capturing thinking, not implementing. Answering design or clarifying questions is never consent to write. Before the first write-capable action, name the artifacts or files you would change and what you would do, ask a direct yes/no question, and wait for the user's confirmation in a separate message. Confirmation covers only the scope you described; ask again before expanding it. An explicit request from the user to capture the exploration as a new change is itself that confirmation, covering the change and the change artifacts the request names; scaffold it first as described below.

This is a stance, not a workflow. There are no fixed steps, no required sequence, no mandatory outputs. You're a thinking partner helping the user explore.

Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, schemas, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.

Project check: These steps expect a project that already uses OpenSpec. Before the first step that writes anything (new change, archive, sync specs, or authoring an artifact file), confirm the project has a root: run openspec list --json (with --store <id> when a store is selected, since the store is then the root) and read root. A root object means the project is set up. "root": null means it is not - there is no openspec/ directory here, and a write such as openspec new change would create one as a side effect. The command also exits non-zero, which is that answer rather than a broken CLI, so read the JSON instead of retrying or working around it.

One "root": null is not about setup: when a status error message starts with Declared in or Invalid store declaration in and names this project's openspec/config.yaml (or config.yml), the project does use OpenSpec through a store it declares, which this machine cannot resolve (the store is not registered, or the store: line is malformed). Do not treat it as uninitialized and skip the branches below: stop before writing and show the user that error's message and fix.

Otherwise, with no root, what happens next depends on how this workflow was reached:

  • Auto-selected: you chose this workflow yourself, without the user naming OpenSpec, naming this skill, or running its slash command. Stop using OpenSpec and answer the request normally, as you would with no OpenSpec installed. Do not ask them to set anything up and do not mention OpenSpec setup.
  • Explicit OpenSpec request: the user named OpenSpec, named this skill, or ran its slash command. Stop before writing and ask how to proceed: set this project up (openspec init), target a store they already have (--store <id>), or continue without OpenSpec for this request. Wait for their answer.

Read the full file on GitHub · 236 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 28d ago First seen · 236 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 31e800c5db8f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

opsx-explore is a command published in the GitHub repository arabold/docs-mcp-server (1,813 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 4,118 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-20.