Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AratKruglik/claude-sdlcWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/list-stacks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/list-stacks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/list-stacks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/list-stacks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/list-stacks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00473 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00236 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00095 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
list-stacks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/sdlc:list-stacks
List every stack.md profile registered in installed plugins. Shows which one would match the current project.
What this command does
- Use
Globto find all stack profiles:~/.claude/plugins/cache/**/stack.md - For each profile found:
Readthe file.- Parse the YAML frontmatter (
stack,priority,detect). - Evaluate
detectrules against the current working directory:detect.any: ["*"]→ always matches.detect.all: [...]→ all sub-rules must match.file_exists: <path>→ check viaGlobif file exists in project root.file_contains: { path, pattern }→Readthe file and run regex.
- Print a table summarizing each profile.
Output format
Stack profiles found:
🎯 vanilla priority=0 (always matches) ← active fallback
🎯 laravel priority=100 matches: composer.json + laravel/framework
🎯 django priority=100 no match: manage.py not present
Active profile for this project: laravel (from laravel-plugin/stack.md)
Override with: /sdlc:start --stack=NAME "<feature>"
If no profiles found except vanilla:
Only the vanilla profile is registered. Install a framework plugin
(e.g. /plugin install laravel-plugin@sdlc-marketplace) to add stack-specific agents.
When to use
- After installing a new stack plugin — verify the profile is picked up.
- When
/sdlc:startchose the wrong stack — debug detection rules. - Before running a pipeline on a new project — confirm what will run.
Instructions
Be concise. Print the table as plain text (no markdown table syntax — that renders poorly in chat). Mark the active profile with ← active. If multiple profiles share the same priority and all match, mark them all and warn about ambiguity.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 54 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 8f87cefee0e4
list-stacks is a command published in the GitHub repository AratKruglik/claude-sdlc (33 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 473 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
doctor
Diagnosticar y reparar problemas del framework Don Cheli, git y entorno. Usa cuando el usuario dice "doctor", "problemas del framework", "don cheli no funciona", "repair Don Cheli", "debug setup", "setup broken", "framework broken", "reparar entorno". Detecta y repara issues de configuración, git y dependencias…
fix
Universal debugging and fix application with semantic code analysis.
doctor
Badi configuration validation. Checks all Badi components and produces a diagnostic report.
http-service
Build, review or debug a Bun HTTP service. Loads the http-service skill, then works the task through its workflow.
gh-issue-use-cypress
Like /gh-issue-use-browser, but pinned to the Cypress MCP — use when your project runs the Cypress MCP for browser automation. Example — /gh-issue-use-cypress "Composer > Save" saving toasts failure but the record persists.