Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arbiterForge/codeArbiterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/arbiterforge/codearbiter/audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/arbiterforge/codearbiter/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/arbiterforge/codearbiter/audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/arbiterforge/codearbiter/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/arbiterforge/codearbiter/audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00703 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00281 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00141 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 51 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 48b68f4d5157
audit is a command published in the GitHub repository arbiterForge/codeArbiter (149 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 703 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
create-prd
Create Product Requirements Document (PRD) for new features.
set-tracker
Set the issue tracker for the current project.
gcloud-search
Find G-Cloud services on UK Digital Marketplace with live search and comparison.
specmanager-build
Build one phase of a SpecManager feature's plan via the builder subagent. Stops at the phase boundary; never advances.
culture-values-ops
Operationalize declared values into systems. For each value, build the matrix — hire criteria, promote criteria, celebration triggers, fire criteria, measurement metric, pay structure — and run the operational test (can an outsider deduce this value from these systems alone?). Refuses values-as-aspiration; insists on…
execute
Execute the next available tracked task with TDD, pre-commit validation, PR creation, AI code review, and issue tracker bridge sync.