Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/architonixlabs/RepoOrchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/architonixlabs/repoorch/repo-orch-sync)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/architonixlabs/repoorch/repo-orch-sync"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/architonixlabs/repoorch/repo-orch-sync/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/architonixlabs/repoorch/repo-orch-sync"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/architonixlabs/repoorch/repo-orch-sync.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.01553 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00776 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00311 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00155 |
Grade A, and why
repo-orch-sync scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 136 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/repo-orch-sync [repo]
Refresh the registry for all repos, or a single named repo.
Usage:
/repo-orch-sync— refresh all repos/repo-orch-sync auth-service— refresh only theauth-servicerepo
Step 1 — Load registry
Read .repo-orchestrator/registry.json. If it does not exist, stop: "Registry not found. Run /repo-orch-init first."
If a repo name was provided, find that entry. If not found, stop: "Repo <name> not found in registry. Available: list all names from the registry."
Step 1.5 — Detect stale entries (full sync only)
Skip this step when a specific repo name was provided.
For each entry in the registry, check whether its path still exists on disk as a directory. If it does not:
-
Flag it as stale and print:
⚠️ Stale registry entry: '<name>' — path '<path>' no longer exists. This repo may have been deleted or renamed. Remove it? [y/N] -
If the user says Y:
- Delete
.claude/agents/repo-<name>.mdif it exists. - Delete
.repo-orchestrator/context/<name>.mdif it exists. - Delete
.repo-orchestrator/skills/<name>.mdif it exists. - Delete
.repo-orchestrator/graphs/<name>/directory if it exists. - Remove the entry from the registry object (do not write yet — the write happens in Step 5).
- Delete
-
If the user says N: leave the entry in place and continue. It will remain stale until removed manually or re-confirmed at the next sync.
After processing all stale entries, continue with Step 2 for the remaining (non-stale) entries only.
Step 2 — Detect drift
For each repo to process:
- Compute a fresh fingerprint using the method from
skills/repo-indexing/SKILL.md. - Compare to the
registry.jsonentry'sfingerprint. - Check if the context file (
.repo-orchestrator/context/<name>.md) was modified afterlastIndexed(compare file mtime to thelastIndexedtimestamp).
Decision:
- If fingerprint unchanged AND context file not modified: repo is up to date — skip and report "No drift detected."
- If fingerprint changed AND context file is NOT newer than
lastIndexed: code has changed — re-index (Step 3a only). - If context file is newer than
lastIndexedAND fingerprint is unchanged: user made manual edits — ingest frontmatter (Step 3b only). - If both fingerprint changed AND context file is newer than
lastIndexed: run Step 3a to re-index, then immediately run Step 3b to merge the user's manual edits on top of the re-indexed values. SetuserEdited: truein the registry entry regardless of the outcome — the user has made intentional edits that must survive future syncs.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 136 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A be632a6b7fc4
repo-orch-sync is a command published in the GitHub repository architonixlabs/RepoOrch (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,553 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
proof-report
Generate a Launch Proof Report for an existing repo by combining release, publish, and security audit evidence.
audit-release
Diagnose release-readiness against the Starter Series quality bar — matched starter, version-vs-last-tag drift, CHANGELOG drift vs merged PRs, and publish-workflow kind. Read-only.
context
A project-context command that manages a .context directory containing decision notes, session logs, and history. It helps keep a record of why changes were made across Git branches and commits.
git
The pre-finish status: branch, hygiene findings, message checks, workflow lint, template state.
composite-actions
Generate, review, secure, and test composite GitHub Actions following best practices — full repo scaffold, interview-driven generation, PR creation on existing repos, SHA pinning, secrets-as-inputs, job summaries, and actionlint validation.
release
Generate changelog, bump version, and create git tag.