analyze

A command that asks Gemini to examine an entire codebase and answer a focused question about it.

In plain words
What is it for?
Running broad codebase reviews, such as finding security risks, performance bottlenecks, unfinished work, or gaps in test coverage.
Why use it?
It helps investigate architecture, security, performance, technical debt, or testing without manually opening every relevant file.

Command

Part of the gemini plugin — 4 skills, 9 commands, 1 agent, 3 hooks shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/arescope/gemini-plugin-cc/analyze
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arescope/gemini-plugin-cc

Or install gemini, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 4 skills, 9 commands, 1 agent, 3 hooks.

Per session 37 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 274 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00037 $0.00274
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.00137
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00055
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00027

Measured 3d ago against content hash 06be1bf8804e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

analyze scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/analyze.md · 30 lines

What it actually says

Run a comprehensive Gemini analysis of the codebase. Leverages the full 1M token context window.

Steps

  1. If no arguments provided, use AskUserQuestion to ask: "What should Gemini analyze? Examples:

    • Architecture review
    • Security audit
    • Performance bottlenecks
    • Tech debt and TODOs
    • Test coverage gaps
    • Or describe your own analysis"
  2. Parse flags: --model <alias>, --effort <level>, --dirs <dirs>, --files <glob> Remaining positional args form the analysis prompt.

  3. Run:

    node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/gemini-companion.mjs" analyze $ARGUMENTS
    
  4. Return the output verbatim.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 30 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 06be1bf8804e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

analyze is a command published in the GitHub repository arescope/gemini-plugin-cc (6 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 274 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.