Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/armanzeroeight/fastagent-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/armanzeroeight/fastagent-plugins/security-scan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/armanzeroeight/fastagent-plugins/security-scan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/armanzeroeight/fastagent-plugins/security-scan.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00620 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00310 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00124 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
security-scan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security Scan
Context
- Project type: !
ls package.json 2>/dev/null && echo "node" || (ls requirements.txt pyproject.toml 2>/dev/null && echo "python" || (ls go.mod 2>/dev/null && echo "go" || echo "unknown")) - Git status: !
git status --short 2>/dev/null | head -5
Your Task
Run a comprehensive security scan on the codebase and report findings organized by severity.
Arguments
$1: Scan type (optional)code- Scan for code vulnerabilities onlysecrets- Scan for hardcoded secrets onlydeps- Audit dependencies onlyall- Run all scans (default)
$2: Minimum severity to report (optional)critical- Only critical issueshigh- High and criticalmedium- Medium and aboveall- All severities (default)
Steps
- Detect project type from manifest files
- Based on scan type ($1 or "all"):
- Code scan: Run appropriate static analysis (bandit for Python, eslint-security for JS)
- Secrets scan: Run gitleaks or grep for common patterns
- Dependency audit: Run npm audit, pip-audit, or govulncheck
- Collect and categorize findings by severity
- Filter by minimum severity ($2 or "all")
- Generate consolidated report
Output Format
# Security Scan Report
**Scanned:** [timestamp]
**Project:** [project name]
**Scan Types:** [code, secrets, deps]
## Summary
| Severity | Count |
|----------|-------|
| Critical | X |
| High | X |
| Medium | X |
| Low | X |
## Critical Issues
[List critical findings with file, line, description, and fix]
## High Issues
[List high findings]
## Recommendations
1. [Priority action items]
Examples
Example 1: Full scan
/security-scan
Runs all security checks and reports all findings
Example 2: Secrets only
/security-scan secrets
Only scans for hardcoded secrets
Example 3: Critical issues only
/security-scan all critical
Runs all scans but only reports critical severity issues
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 92 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 6a3af32401e2
security-scan is a command published in the GitHub repository armanzeroeight/fastagent-plugins (29 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 620 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
prp-plan
Create comprehensive feature implementation plan with codebase analysis and pattern extraction.
prp-implement
Execute an implementation plan with rigorous validation loops.
save-session
Save current session state to a dated file in /.claude/session-data/ so work can be resumed in a future session with full context.
code-review
Code review — local uncommitted changes or GitHub PR (pass PR number/URL for PR mode).
plan
Restate requirements, assess risks, and create step-by-step implementation plan. WAIT for user CONFIRM before touching any code.
pm2
Analyze a project and generate PM2 service commands for detected frontend, backend, or database services.