Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/armoin2018/ai-leyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/armoin2018/ai-ley/go-to-market)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/armoin2018/ai-ley/go-to-market"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/armoin2018/ai-ley/go-to-market/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/armoin2018/ai-ley/go-to-market"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/armoin2018/ai-ley/go-to-market.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00162 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00081 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00032 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
go-to-market scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Go-to-Market Strategy Command
- Follow the prompt instructions found in
.ai-ley/shared/prompts/go-to-market.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 20 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 884eebf66bf7
go-to-market is a command published in the GitHub repository armoin2018/ai-ley (11 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed CC0-1.0. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 162 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
weekly-review
Weekly review — read the week's logs, surface patterns, set next week's one priority.
reconcile
Reconcile drift — make the mirror, the tasks, and the log agree before they diverge.
lp
Creates or refines a long-form sales landing page (2000-3500 words). Uses Grand Slam Offer, Value Equation, bonus stacking, scarcity/urgency, guarantees. Humanizer full mode mandatory. Soft warning if there's no recent audit.
review
Brutal feedback on existing material (LP, ad, email, proposal, post). Verdict by severity (MINOR/MODERATE/CRITICAL), top 3 concrete fixes, rewrite of the critical passages. Hormozi persona, no mercy but with a constructive fix.
objections
Objection matrix by ICP. Every objection mapped to a root cause (offer / price / timing), a two-sentence reframe, a word-for-word sales-call script, and an offer-side mitigation. For the consultant on a sales call and the founder mapping recurring objections.
positioning
Competitive teardown + positioning statement. Maps 3-5 direct competitors (features, price, persona, message), finds the differentiation axes, proposes a testable positioning statement. For a founder entering a niche with established competitors, or one who feels their message is "indistinguishable".