Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Arsxxi/iterative-dev-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/arsxxi/iterative-dev-workflow/phase-4)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/arsxxi/iterative-dev-workflow/phase-4"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/arsxxi/iterative-dev-workflow/phase-4/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/arsxxi/iterative-dev-workflow/phase-4"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/arsxxi/iterative-dev-workflow/phase-4.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.00409 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00164 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00082 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
phase-4 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Arguments
Kilo Code does not substitute $ARGUMENTS. Wherever this command refers to
$ARGUMENTS, read it as the text I typed after the slash command in this message.
Expected: project name
If I typed nothing after the command, do not guess and do not invent a value: ask me
for it with the question tool, then continue from there.
Step 0 — find which project this is for
Before anything else, figure out which project this command applies to:
- If you were given a project name after the slash (e.g.
/phase-4 my-project), use it. - Otherwise, look at the subfolders under
.workflow/:- Exactly one folder → use it. Tell the user which project you picked (e.g. "Working on
my-project"), so it's never a silent guess. - Two or more folders → ask the user once which project this is for. To make the question
useful, show the first line of each project's
00-context.md, not just the folder name. - No folders → stop and tell the user to run
/kickofffirst. Don't proceed.
- Exactly one folder → use it. Tell the user which project you picked (e.g. "Working on
Phase 4: Postmortem
Purpose
Reflect on the iteration to improve the next one.
Prerequisites
- Phase 3 (Implement) is complete
Steps
- What went well? — capture successful patterns
- What could be better? — identify friction and slowdowns
- What will we do differently? — concrete improvements for next iteration
- Update workflow — if a process change is needed, update the relevant command files
Output
- Postmortem document
- Action items for next iteration
- Updated workflow documentation (if needed)
Trigger
$ARGUMENTS = "project name"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 53 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A cdd1a3f66447
phase-4 is a command published in the GitHub repository Arsxxi/iterative-dev-workflow (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 409 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
octo-schedule
Manage scheduled workflow jobs for the Claude Octopus scheduler.
octo-scheduler
Manage the Claude Octopus scheduled workflow runner daemon.
notebook-query
Query the notebook knowledge base (SQLite) built by /agy:notebook — precise, grounded, cited. Ask in natural language ("sum the amounts by category", "which docs mention 'Acme Corp'", "build a project timeline") or pass raw SQL. Read-only. Use this when you need exact aggregates/lookups across a document corpus…
record
Record a browser walkthrough of a URL using Antigravity (agy). Generates .webm video, screenshots, and a report. Auto-converts to MP4 if ffmpeg is available.
next
Read the active sprint’s current status. Refresh stale compilation using grainulator compile --dir or grainulator.compile. Use the resulting nextactions with the user’s current scope and authorization. Output only the two Auto and Manual lists below, with no recap, status counters or offer to continue. Continue useful…
standup
Show a daily standup summary with completed, in-progress, and blocked tasks across all active epics.