Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aryasaatvik/coding-agent-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/aryasaatvik/coding-agent-plugins/release)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/aryasaatvik/coding-agent-plugins/release"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/aryasaatvik/coding-agent-plugins/release/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/aryasaatvik/coding-agent-plugins/release"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/aryasaatvik/coding-agent-plugins/release.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.01762 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00705 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00352 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00176 |
Grade A, and why
release scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 259 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Release Plugin Command
Release a specific plugin using the namespace@version tag pattern.
Current Context
- Working directory: !
pwd - Current branch: !
git branch --show-current - Git status: !
git status --short - Available plugins: !
ls -1 plugins/
Your Task
Create a release for a specific plugin using the <plugin-name>@<version> tag pattern (e.g., [email protected]).
Prerequisites Verification
Before proceeding, verify:
- Clean working directory: No uncommitted changes (unless they're the release commit itself)
- Correct branch: On
mainbranch (or ask user to confirm if on a different branch) - All tests pass: Run tests for the plugin being released
Release Process
Phase 1: Information Gathering
- List available plugins from
plugins/directory - Ask user which plugin to release (if not obvious from context)
- Read current version from
plugins/<plugin>/package.json - Ask user for new version:
- Show current version
- Suggest semver bumps:
- Patch:
x.y.z → x.y.z+1(bug fixes) - Minor:
x.y.z → x.y+1.0(new features, backward compatible) - Major:
x.y.z → x+1.0.0(breaking changes)
- Patch:
- Allow custom version input
- Validate version:
- Must be valid semver (e.g.,
1.0.0,2.1.0-beta.1) - Check tag doesn't already exist:
git tag -l "<plugin>@<version>"
- Must be valid semver (e.g.,
- Ask for changelog entry or offer to generate from recent commits
Phase 2: Update Version Files
Update version in exactly 3 files (atomically):
-
plugins/<plugin>/package.json:{ "version": "<new-version>" } -
plugins/<plugin>/.claude-plugin/plugin.json:{ "version": "<new-version>" } -
.claude-plugin/marketplace.json: Update the specific plugin's version in the plugins array:{ "plugins": [ { "name": "<plugin>", "version": "<new-version>", ... } ] }
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 14d ago Changed · +19 lines 628c4dcaf2ed
- 2mo ago First seen · 240 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A dc88113f99ae
release is a command published in the GitHub repository aryasaatvik/coding-agent-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 1,762 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
land
Resolve and squash merge one named, currently authorized pull request.
quality
A command for temporarily clearing a release quality gate or one named check, while recording the reason and expiry time. A quality gate is a required check that normally blocks completion or release.
release-notes
Generate consistent, well-structured release notes from git history. Triggered on release tags following semver patterns (v..) to produce categorized changelog with breaking changes, features, fixes, and contributor attribution.
create-pr
Push the current branch and open a pull request into main with a structured description derived from the branch's commits and the open issues it resolves.
release-manager
Automated release coordination and deployment with ruv-swarm orchestration for seamless version management, testing, and deployment across multiple packages.
release-plan
A release-planning command for a software change. It documents the release scope, rollback plan, gradual or full rollout, and monitoring before waiting for human approval.