Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/asachs01/float-mcp/list-tasks-by-statusgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/asachs01/float-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/asachs01/float-mcp/list-tasks-by-status)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/asachs01/float-mcp/list-tasks-by-status"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/asachs01/float-mcp/list-tasks-by-status.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00231 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00115 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00046 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
list-tasks-by-status scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to list-tasks-by-status — 5 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
List tasks filtered by a specific status.
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
Parse the status from arguments and list only tasks matching that status.
Status Options
pending- Not yet startedin-progress- Currently being worked ondone- Completedreview- Awaiting reviewdeferred- Postponedcancelled- Cancelled
Execution
Based on $ARGUMENTS, run:
task-master list --status=$ARGUMENTS
Enhanced Display
For the filtered results:
- Group by priority within the status
- Show time in current status
- Highlight tasks approaching deadlines
- Display blockers and dependencies
- Suggest next actions for each status group
Intelligent Insights
Based on the status filter:
- Pending: Show recommended start order
- In-Progress: Display idle time warnings
- Done: Show newly unblocked tasks
- Review: Indicate review duration
- Deferred: Show reactivation criteria
- Cancelled: Display impact analysis
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 44 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 39e5a718350a
list-tasks-by-status is a command published in the GitHub repository asachs01/float-mcp (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 231 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to list-tasks-by-status, differing in 5 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
tasks
Break down the plan into executable tasks.
plan
Plan how to implement the specified feature.
specify
Start a new feature by creating a specification and feature branch.
review-epo-claims
Analyze patent claims for EPO Art. 84 EPC compliance - clarity, conciseness, support by description.
new
Creates a new item in a module that supports the new capability.
ingest-dev
Ingest a URL, directory, or file into your knowledge base. remember = a specific durable fact, ingest = a URL, learn = a distilled lesson that gets retrieval preference.