audit

audit is a command for coding agents from aself101/agents-and-pipelines. It costs 35 tokens per session (1,242 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A final review of running code for correctness problems such as asynchronous-operation bugs, null-value errors, silent failures, and edge cases.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps audit software before release and catch runtime problems that could affect real users.
Why use it?
It finds defects that other checks may miss, including failures that do not produce an obvious error.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/aself101/agents-and-pipelines/audit
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aself101/agents-and-pipelines

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for audit

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/aself101/agents-and-pipelines/audit.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/aself101/agents-and-pipelines/audit)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/aself101/agents-and-pipelines/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/aself101/agents-and-pipelines/audit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 35 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,242 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00035 $0.01242
Opus 5 $0.00017 $0.00621
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00248
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00124

Measured yesterday against content hash 471a00174870, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/audit.md · 172 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 172 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 471a00174870

Subscribe to this mod's changes

audit is a command published in the GitHub repository aself101/agents-and-pipelines (53 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 1,242 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.