Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/ashikparvez89/larouex-fullstack-plugin/review-componentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ashikparvez89/larouex-fullstack-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ashikparvez89/larouex-fullstack-plugin/review-component)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ashikparvez89/larouex-fullstack-plugin/review-component"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ashikparvez89/larouex-fullstack-plugin/review-component.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00132 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00066 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00026 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
review-component scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to review-component — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Review a specific React component file using code-review-agent and frontend-development-agent. Analyze component architecture, proper Server vs Client component usage, prop types, hooks patterns (useState, useEffect, useCallback, useMemo), accessibility attributes (ARIA labels, semantic HTML, keyboard navigation), performance optimizations (React.memo, code splitting), Bootstrap 5 responsive design, error boundaries, and loading states. Check for prop drilling, unnecessary re-renders, and testability. Provide component-specific best practices with code examples. Specify the component file path after the command. Output includes severity-rated findings, quick fixes, and refactoring suggestions to improve maintainability and user experience.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 2 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 155a78653588
review-component is a command published in the GitHub repository Ashikparvez89/larouex-fullstack-plugin (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 132 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to review-component, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
add-error-boundary
Implement React error boundaries throughout the application. Create error boundary component with componentDidCatch lifecycle. Add fallback UI with friendly error message and retry button. Log errors to monitoring service (Sentry, Azure Monitor) with stack traces. Implement granular boundaries for different sections…
add-websockets-railway
Implement WebSockets using Socket.io on Railway. Set up Socket.io server integrated with Express application. Configure CORS for WebSocket connections. Create client connection hooks with React. Implement room-based messaging for grouped communication. Add user authentication for WebSocket connections using JWT.…
review-code
Review all uncommitted changes in the current working directory using code-review-agent. Analyze code quality, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility compliance, and adherence to Next.js 15 and React 18+ best practices. Check TypeScript strict mode compliance, proper Server/Client component usage…
review-component
Review a specific React component file using code-review-agent and frontend-development-agent. Analyze component architecture, proper Server vs Client component usage, prop types, hooks patterns (useState, useEffect, useCallback, useMemo), accessibility attributes (ARIA labels, semantic HTML, keyboard navigation)…
review-performance
Analyze application performance using code-review-agent and monitoring-observability-agent. Check Core Web Vitals (LCP < 2.5s, FID < 100ms, CLS < 0.1), bundle size analysis, image optimization (next/image, WebP format), font optimization (next/font), code splitting and lazy loading, caching strategies…
migrate-to-nextjs15
Upgrade this Next.js project to version 15. Update package.json dependencies to Next.js 15 and React 19. Migrate App Router patterns and update metadata API usage following latest conventions. Fix breaking changes in configuration, middleware, and API routes. Update next.config.ts with new configuration options. Test…