Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/askarzh/epistematorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/askarzh/epistemator/scholastic)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/askarzh/epistemator/scholastic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/askarzh/epistemator/scholastic/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/askarzh/epistemator/scholastic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/askarzh/epistemator/scholastic.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00080 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00032 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00016 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00008 |
Grade A, and why
scholastic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Invoke the scholastic skill to analyze the user's input.
If the user includes --interactive in their arguments, use Interactive Mode as described in the skill. Otherwise, use Structured Mode.
The user's input to analyze: $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 11 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A d17eda489e36
scholastic is a command published in the GitHub repository askarzh/epistemator (3 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 80 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
dotnet-teach
One-time setup that scans a .NET backend project, learns its conventions and architecture, and writes them to CLAUDE.md for future sessions.
study-help
Explain the agentic-study-environment harness — everything it offers, or a specific skill, domain overlay, session type, or convention if you name one.
ux-audit
Run a combined usability + accessibility audit on a page, component, or screenshot and produce a single scored report.
ux-onboarding
Get familiar with a project's UX/design choices and patterns — a guided, part-by-part walkthrough that sends you to read the real code, checks your understanding with questions, and has you reimplement a small recent change.
ux-help
Explain the ux-design plugin — everything it offers, or a specific skill, command, agent, or tool if you name one.
ux-review
Quick, scored UX review of a single component or screen — from code, a screenshot, or a live page — via the ux-reviewer agent.