Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add assafkip/kipi-system/plugin install kipi-dsseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-approve)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-approve"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-approve/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-approve"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-approve.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00592 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00237 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00118 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
issue-approve scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Autonomy contract (advisor-approved, founder gated only at charter level). In the v2 rewrite topology, plan approvals route to the advisor (main session), not to the founder. Founder approval at /prd-split commit already authorized the manifest, including each issue's allowed_files and required_checks. Plan approvals refine that authorization at the issue level and are advisor-owned.
- Issue 1 of a PRD: advisor-gated. The advisor (main session) sees the plan via the channel, replies
approve(or surfaces a redirect). Founder is NOT routed unless the plan introduces a scope amendment relative to the manifest. - Issues 2..N of the same PRD: agent self-approves IF the loaded plan's
allowed_filesandrequired_checksmatch the PRD manifest verbatim AND the plan does not introduce a scope amendment. Run/issue-approvedirectly without waiting for advisor or founder. - Any deviation from the manifest (new path, removed check, mid-issue scope amendment): founder-gated. Surface the diff with
[FOUNDER-INPUT-NEEDED]and wait. Scope amendments are charter-level changes the founder owns.
Founder-gated steps remain (charter-level only):
/prd-approve(founder owns the PRD contract)/prd-splitcommit (founder owns the issues manifest)- Mid-issue scope amendments (founder owns scope)
Everything else self-progresses or routes to the advisor. Codex finding triage and disposition during /issue-closeout are agent-handled per the closeout autonomy contract.
Approve the active DSSE issue after the advisor (or, for scope amendments, the founder) has signed off on the plan. Execute in order:
-
Run
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_runner.py" approve. This reads the active issue spec, confirms its status is currentlyopen, and flips it toin-progress. The command writes the spec directly — do not use theEdittool for this. -
If approve exits non-zero:
- No active issue: tell the founder to run
/issue-start <issue-id>first. - Status already in-progress: safe to proceed, the runner is idempotent on re-approval.
- Any other error: report it verbatim. Do not edit the spec manually to work around it.
- No active issue: tell the founder to run
-
Confirm in one line: "Issue $ISSUE_ID is now in-progress. Stop-time gate is armed."
After approval, proceed with the first concrete change from the plan. All edits must target allowed_files. Normal DSSE flow resumes: /issue-verify, /issue-review, /issue-closeout.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 30 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A caba96ffdbfc
issue-approve is a command published in the GitHub repository assafkip/kipi-system (131 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 592 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
issue-approve compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| issue-approveassafkip/kipi-system | Command | 131 | today | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |
| recallmodeled-information-format/mnemonic | Command | 23 | 11d ago | MIT | A | 9 | Claude Code |
| querymodeled-information-format/mnemonic | Command | 23 | 11d ago | MIT | A | 9 | Claude Code |
| searchmodeled-information-format/mnemonic | Command | 23 | 11d ago | MIT | A | 8 | Claude Code |
| gcmodeled-information-format/mnemonic | Command | 23 | 11d ago | MIT | B | 7 | Claude Code |
| setupmodeled-information-format/mnemonic | Command | 23 | 11d ago | MIT | B | 8 | Claude Code |
| statusmodeled-information-format/mnemonic | Command | 23 | 11d ago | MIT | B | 8 | Claude Code |