Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add assafkip/kipi-system/plugin install kipi-dsseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-closeout)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-closeout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-closeout/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-closeout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-closeout.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.01654 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00662 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00331 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00165 |
Grade A, and why
issue-closeout scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Autonomy contract. This step is agent-handled, not founder-gated. Once every pending in-scope finding has a non-pending disposition (accepted/rejected/deferred) AND every accepted patch has been applied with required_checks green, close the issue automatically without founder confirmation. The founder is notified post-closeout via the final report (step 6). Founder-gated steps remain: /issue-approve, /prd-approve, /prd-split commit, and any mid-issue scope amendment. Disposition rationale text and patch correctness still need to meet the merge-blocker rules in step 3. Autonomy is about removing the gate prompt, not lowering the bar.
Close the active DSSE issue. Execute in order:
-
Run
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_runner.py" status. Confirmreceipts.verifiedandreceipts.reviewedare both set. If either is null, stop and tell the founder which step is missing. Do not relaunch/issue-reviewon your own initiative; that command has its own iteration cap. -
Pull the snapshotted scope and the pending findings:
ALLOWED=$(python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_runner.py" allowed-files) ISSUE_ID=$(python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_runner.py" status | python3 -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin).get('issue_id',''))") python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_findings.py" list "$ISSUE_ID" --only-pendingThe list output is JSON: each finding has
id,source,severity,body,affected_path,out_of_scope. Show them to the founder one by one. Out-of-scope findings are already filtered from the gate but are still in the list for visibility. -
Triage each pending in-scope finding using these merge-blocker rules. The disposition is the verb. Use the writer; do NOT hand-edit the JSONL:
-
accepted -> correctness bug introduced by this issue's diff. Patch it now in
allowed_files. After the patch lands, mark accepted (theresolved_atstamp is the receipt that the patch happened):python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_findings.py" set-disposition "$ISSUE_ID" <finding-id> acceptedIf the patch requires re-running checks, re-run
/issue-verify. Do NOT auto-relaunch/issue-review. The runner's review-rounds cap exists to break loops; you must respect it. The founder opts in if they want another adversarial pass. -
deferred -> valid finding but out of contract for this issue (architectural debt, unchanged-code patterns, follow-up work). Rationale REQUIRED. Optional
--followup-issue-idif a tracking issue exists:python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_findings.py" set-disposition "$ISSUE_ID" <finding-id> deferred \ --rationale "tracked for follow-up: applies to all 09 agents, not just this slice" -
rejected -> Codex misread scope or hallucinated the issue. Rationale REQUIRED:
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_findings.py" set-disposition "$ISSUE_ID" <finding-id> rejected \ --rationale "codex flagged a config value that is intentionally null; design doc says null disables the feature"
-
-
After every pending in-scope finding has a non-pending disposition (the runner's gate counts these), check the count:
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_findings.py" count "$ISSUE_ID" --in-scope-pendingMust print
0. If non-zero, the gate will block close. Re-triage the remaining findings. -
Commit the patches applied above first:
closere-reads the size class from committed HEAD, and uncommitted code counts as L. Record triage, then close. Run these as two separate steps and STOP if the first one exits non-zero -- there is noset -ehere, so a failedtriagewould otherwise fall through intocloseand produce a confusing second failure at the receipt gate:python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_runner.py" triage python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_runner.py" close
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +10 lines 5aa5145c6149
- 2mo ago First seen · 84 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 2625ff2da3db
issue-closeout is a command published in the GitHub repository assafkip/kipi-system (131 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 1,654 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
issue-closeout compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| issue-closeoutassafkip/kipi-system | Command | 131 | today | MIT | A | 20 | Claude Code |
| recallmodeled-information-format/mnemonic | Command | 23 | 11d ago | MIT | A | 9 | Claude Code |
| querymodeled-information-format/mnemonic | Command | 23 | 11d ago | MIT | A | 9 | Claude Code |
| searchmodeled-information-format/mnemonic | Command | 23 | 11d ago | MIT | A | 8 | Claude Code |
| gcmodeled-information-format/mnemonic | Command | 23 | 11d ago | MIT | B | 7 | Claude Code |
| setupmodeled-information-format/mnemonic | Command | 23 | 11d ago | MIT | B | 8 | Claude Code |
| statusmodeled-information-format/mnemonic | Command | 23 | 11d ago | MIT | B | 8 | Claude Code |