Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/assafkip/kipi-systemWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-verify.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00537 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00269 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00107 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
issue-verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Autonomy contract. This step is agent-handled, not founder-gated. Verify automatically once required_checks have all exited 0. Record the verified receipt without founder confirmation. The receipt itself is the audit signal: the founder reads it after the fact, not before. Founder-gated steps are still: /issue-approve, /prd-approve, /prd-split commit, and any scope amendment mid-issue. This step is not one of them.
Verify the active DSSE issue. Execute in order:
-
Run
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_runner.py" status. Confirm an issue is loaded. Ifissue_idis null, stop and tell the founder to run/issue-start <issue-id>first. -
Run
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_runner.py" verify.This ONE command is the whole step. It runs every check in the spec snapshot itself, records each check's exit code and an output hash as evidence, and writes the verified receipt only if all of them exit 0.
Do NOT run the checks by hand first.
verifyruns them from the snapshot taken at/issue-start, which is the thing the receipt attests to; a check you ran yourself from the live spec can differ from that snapshot, and the receipt would then describe a run nobody made. There is no way to record this receipt without running the checks --mark verifiedrefuses by design (ASK-402). -
If
verifyexits 0:- Report: "verified receipt recorded at ."
- Read
checksfrom its JSON output and list them, one per line (checks_runis the count).
-
If
verifyexits 2:- It already printed which check failed and its exit code. Report that.
- The evidence is stored even on a red run; the receipt is withheld.
- An empty
required_checkslist also exits 2. That is not a passing issue, it is a spec with nothing to attest to: tell the founder to add a check or amend the spec. - Stop. Do not attempt to fix silently. Tell the founder.
Do not run /codex:review here. That is /issue-review.
Do not edit the spec here. That happens only in /issue-start and /issue-closeout.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 39 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 0b948e550990
issue-verify is a command published in the GitHub repository assafkip/kipi-system (109 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 537 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
capture
Search first: /mnemonic:search {relevantkeywords} Capture after: /mnemonic:capture {namespace} "{title}".
recall
Recall memories with filtering and search.
custodian
Unified memory custodian for audits, validation, and maintenance.
integrate
Wire mnemonic memory operations into other Claude Code plugins.
add-test
Interactively add a new test definition to the test suite.
run-tests
Run automated functional tests using the hook-driven test framework. Execute the test suite to validate all project functionality.