issue-verify

issue-verify is a command for Claude Code from assafkip/kipi-system. It costs 13 tokens per session (1,116 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command that runs every required check for the active work item and records proof that they passed. The proof includes each check's result and a hash of its output.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to run the issue's tests or other required checks, create a verified receipt when all pass, and make the issue ready for review.
Why use it?
It ensures the recorded verification refers to the exact checks defined when the issue began, rather than to a changed version of the specification.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} variable. Also seen: mentions Codex.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the kipi-dsse plugin — 6 commands shipped together

Good fit Use it to run the issue's tests or other required checks, create a verified receipt when all pass, and make the issue ready for review.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add assafkip/kipi-system
Claude Code
/plugin install kipi-dsse

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install kipi-dsse, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 6 commands.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for issue-verify

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-verify/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-verify)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for issue-verify

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/assafkip/kipi-system/issue-verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 13 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,116 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00013 $0.01116
Opus 5.5 $0.00005 $0.00446
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00223
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00112

Measured today against content hash db5bb386706b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

issue-verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/kipi-dsse/commands/issue-verify.md · 73 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Autonomy contract. This step is agent-handled, not founder-gated. Verify automatically once required_checks have all exited 0. Record the verified receipt without founder confirmation. The receipt itself is the audit signal: the founder reads it after the fact, not before. Founder-gated steps are still: /issue-approve, /prd-approve, /prd-split commit, and any scope amendment mid-issue. This step is not one of them.

Verify the active DSSE issue. Execute in order:

  1. Run python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_runner.py" status. Confirm an issue is loaded. If issue_id is null, stop and tell the founder to run /issue-start <issue-id> first.

  2. Commit the issue's work first. The size class (ASK-1749 tier) reads committed HEAD, so uncommitted code verifies, reviews and closes at L. Then run python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_runner.py" verify.

    This ONE command is the whole step. It runs every check in the spec snapshot itself, records each check's exit code and an output hash as evidence, and writes the verified receipt only if all of them exit 0.

    Do NOT run the checks by hand first. verify runs them from the snapshot taken at /issue-start, which is the thing the receipt attests to; a check you ran yourself from the live spec can differ from that snapshot, and the receipt would then describe a run nobody made. There is no way to record this receipt without running the checks -- mark verified refuses by design (ASK-402).

    An issue loaded after ASK-1810 (its state carries "verify_contract": 2) gets more from the same command, all computed by verify and sealed into the receipt, never typed:

    • a check that runs the full suite (verify.sh --full, bare pytest, kipi check) is refused before anything runs; CI runs it once per PR;
    • real_path: which of the issue's non-test .py files each check ran at its tracked path, seen by real_path_observer/sitecustomize.py; a check that only runs a copy is refused;
    • defined_vs_ran: test functions in each named Python test file, from the AST, against the runner's own count; hidden tests are refused;
    • repeats: the checks rerun inside a 20-minute budget as many times as the diff's size class earns (S: 2, refused below 2; M and L: up to 10, refused below 5), and refused on any red run.
    • mutants (ASK-2768): each mutant run recorded for this issue, judged against verify's own clean run. caught names the tests that failed only under the mutant; a test failing in both runs is not counted. A silent mutant (the runner's output shows no new failure) is refused by name. No caught mutant is recorded as gap, not refused. A typed tally is never read: verify reads only <state_dir>/mutants/<issue_id>/*.json, and only the mutant verb writes there.

    To record a mutant (founder budget: one per new decision point): apply a one-line break to the tracked file, run python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_runner.py" mutant <name> (lowercase letters, digits, dashes), put the code back, then run verify. The mutant verb runs the snapshot's checks and stores their raw output; it never judges. Only verify turns that output into a count.

  3. If verify exits 0:

    • Report: "verified receipt recorded at ."
    • Read checks from its JSON output and list them, one per line (checks_run is the count).
    • Under contract 2, also paste real_path, defined_vs_ran, mutants and repeats from the same JSON. These are the closeout numbers; do not restate them from memory. A mutant count that is not in mutants is a claim, not a closeout number.
  4. If verify exits 2:

    • It already printed which check failed and its exit code. Report that.
    • The evidence is stored even on a red run; the receipt is withheld.
    • An empty required_checks list also exits 2. That is not a passing issue, it is a spec with nothing to attest to: tell the founder to add a check or amend the spec.
    • Stop. Do not attempt to fix silently. Tell the founder.

Read the full file on GitHub · 73 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today Changed · +3 lines db5bb386706b
  2. 16d ago Changed · +15 lines 3aa3db227ca1
  3. 1mo ago Changed · +16 lines e60756288cbe
  4. 2mo ago First seen · 39 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 0b948e550990

Subscribe to this mod's changes

issue-verify is a command published in the GitHub repository assafkip/kipi-system (131 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 1,116 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

issue-verify compared with commands from other repositories

issue-verify next to 6 commands from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
issue-verifyassafkip/kipi-systemCommand131todayMITA13Claude Code
recallmodeled-information-format/mnemonicCommand2311d agoMITA9Claude Code
querymodeled-information-format/mnemonicCommand2311d agoMITA9Claude Code
searchmodeled-information-format/mnemonicCommand2311d agoMITA8Claude Code
gcmodeled-information-format/mnemonicCommand2311d agoMITB7Claude Code
setupmodeled-information-format/mnemonicCommand2311d agoMITB8Claude Code
statusmodeled-information-format/mnemonicCommand2311d agoMITB8Claude Code