Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/assafkip/prd-os/issue-startgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/assafkip/prd-osWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00407 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00204 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
issue-start scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are starting a DSSE issue. The issue id is: $ARGUMENTS
Execute the following, in order:
-
Run
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_runner.py" load $ARGUMENTS. The output is JSON describing the loaded spec. If the command exits non-zero, stop and report the error. Do not invent an issue spec. -
Read the full spec file at the
spec_pathreturned by step 1. -
Present a plan to the founder:
- One line summarizing the title and priority.
- The full
allowed_fileslist exactly as loaded. State explicitly: "all edits must target one of these paths." - The full
required_checkslist. State: "these must all exit 0 before/issue-verifywill record the verified receipt." - The full
required_reviewslist. - The first concrete change you plan to make, in one sentence.
-
Wait for the founder to approve the plan or redirect. Do not flip the spec status and do not start editing until they confirm.
-
On approval, run
/issue-approve. That command flips the spec status fromopentoin-progressand arms the stop-time gate. Planning before this step is intentionally gate-exempt so a loaded spec does not spam the Stop hook while the plan is being reviewed.
Rules while the issue is loaded:
- Every edit you make must target a path that matches
allowed_files. - The PreToolUse scope hook will block out-of-scope edits automatically.
- Do not mark the issue verified, reviewed, or closed yourself. Use
/issue-verify,/issue-review,/issue-closeout. - If you discover mid-issue that the scope is wrong, update the spec file's
allowed_filesfirst, explain why, then continue.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 30 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 3f86a8f5d10b
issue-start is a command published in the GitHub repository assafkip/prd-os (10 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 407 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
plan-phase
Wraps superpowers:writing-plans with RENATA guardrails to produce a method-compliant, ADR-respecting execution plan reviewed by the architect.
adopt
Adopts RENATA in an existing codebase — reverse-engineers the technical pattern, feature inventory, as-built specs and a retroactive PRD, confirming every item with you.
adr
Formalizes an ADR from a technical decision using the Nygard format and syncs its enforcement block in rules.yaml.
screens
Structures product UX screen design — inventory, flow, states, and reusable briefs for external design tools — without generating pixels or UI code.
assumption-test
Surfaces the riskiest business assumption behind the PRD and designs the cheapest test to falsify it before building.
bug-report
Converts a raw bug report from production into a structured, severity-classified item and routes it to the right next step.