Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/assafkip/prd-os/issue-verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/assafkip/prd-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/assafkip/prd-os/issue-verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/assafkip/prd-os/issue-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/assafkip/prd-os/issue-verify.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00303 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00151 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00061 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
issue-verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Verify the active DSSE issue. Execute in order:
-
Run
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_runner.py" status. Confirm an issue is loaded. Ifissue_idis null, stop and tell the founder to run/issue-start <issue-id>first. -
Read the spec's
required_checkslist (already in the status output's loaded spec, or re-load the spec file directly). -
Run every check in the list, one at a time, from the repo root. For each:
- Echo the command before running.
- Run it via
Bash. - Capture exit code and the last ~20 lines of output.
-
If every check exits 0:
- Run
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_runner.py" mark verified. - Report: "verified receipt recorded at ."
- List the checks that ran, one per line.
- Run
-
If any check fails:
- Do NOT call
mark verified. - Report which check failed, its exit code, and the relevant output.
- Stop. Do not attempt to fix silently. Tell the founder.
- Do NOT call
Do not run /codex:review here. That is /issue-review.
Do not edit the spec here. That happens only in /issue-start and /issue-closeout.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 28 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A c4dded133b15
issue-verify is a command published in the GitHub repository assafkip/prd-os (10 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 303 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
plan-phase
Wraps superpowers:writing-plans with RENATA guardrails to produce a method-compliant, ADR-respecting execution plan reviewed by the architect.
adopt
Adopts RENATA in an existing codebase — reverse-engineers the technical pattern, feature inventory, as-built specs and a retroactive PRD, confirming every item with you.
adr
Formalizes an ADR from a technical decision using the Nygard format and syncs its enforcement block in rules.yaml.
screens
Structures product UX screen design — inventory, flow, states, and reusable briefs for external design tools — without generating pixels or UI code.
assumption-test
Surfaces the riskiest business assumption behind the PRD and designs the cheapest test to falsify it before building.
bug-report
Converts a raw bug report from production into a structured, severity-classified item and routes it to the right next step.