Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to assistant-ui/tool-ui. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/assistant-ui/tool-ui/main/.claude/commands/review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/assistant-ui/tool-uiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/assistant-ui/tool-ui/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/assistant-ui/tool-ui/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/assistant-ui/tool-ui/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/assistant-ui/tool-ui/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/assistant-ui/tool-ui/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00004 | $0.00177 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00071 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00035 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review $ARGUMENTS for:
-
Security Issues
- XSS vulnerabilities
- Unsafe user input handling
- API key exposure
- OWASP Top 10 concerns
-
Performance
- Unnecessary re-renders
- Missing memoization
- Large bundle impacts
- Inefficient algorithms
-
Type Safety
- Missing TypeScript types
- Unsafe
anyusage - Type assertions that could fail
-
Best Practices
- React hooks rules
- Component composition
- Error boundaries
- Accessibility (a11y)
-
Code Quality
- Readability
- Maintainability
- DRY principle violations
- Magic numbers/strings
Provide specific line references and actionable fixes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 36 lines · 4 tokens per session scan A c7a7501d524e
review is a command published in the GitHub repository assistant-ui/tool-ui (779 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 4 tokens to every session and 177 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
code-review
Run the code-reviewer subagent on the current diff against origin/development (review-only, no edits).
feature-pipeline
Run this workflow in order in one conversation, unless the user stops between steps.
review-changes
Alias for /code-review kept for backwards compatibility with the existing /feature-pipeline workflow.
apply-review
You are in fix-only mode.
quality-gate
Run the ECC quality pipeline on demand for a file or project scope.
review
Review code changes against project conventions.