Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/assistant-ui/tool-ui/testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/assistant-ui/tool-uiWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00146 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00073 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00029 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Generate unit tests for $ARGUMENTS covering:
- Happy Path - Normal expected behavior
- Edge Cases - Boundary conditions, empty states, null/undefined
- Error Handling - Failed API calls, invalid inputs, exceptions
- User Interactions - Clicks, inputs, form submissions
- State Changes - Component state updates, prop changes
- Async Behavior - Promises, loading states, race conditions
Use:
- React Testing Library for components
- Mock external dependencies
- Descriptive test names
- Arrange-Act-Assert pattern
- Follow existing test patterns in the codebase
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 20 lines · 3 tokens per session scan A c90db30e7117
test is a command published in the GitHub repository assistant-ui/tool-ui (773 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 3 tokens to every session and 146 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
sddesign
Full spec-driven pipeline — walks brief → tokens → shape (spec) → craft (build) → converge → ship in one guided run. Writes .ui-craft/spec.md. Run when starting a net-new surface from scratch.
tokens
Audit or establish the project's 3-layer token spine.
craft
One-shot build pipeline for a complete surface from an outcome recipe — inputs (or defaults) → composition → theme → build order → acceptance bar. Use when the user asks for a whole surface ("build me a dashboard", "I need a landing page") and expects a shippable result, not component-level help.
audit
Technical UI audit — a11y, performance, responsive. Produces a prioritized findings table.
critique
Design lens critique covering visual hierarchy, clarity, and anti-slop patterns — produces a findings table, no code edits unless asked. Use when the user wants a design review, says "what's wrong with this UI", or needs a second opinion before a handoff or presentation.
heuristic
Produce a scored heuristic critique of the UI using Nielsen's 10 + 6 design laws + optional persona walkthroughs. Outputs a machine-parseable scorecard plus a 0-100 UsabilityScore (the judged companion to the deterministic UICraftScore).